Merleau-ponty video compilations

Merleau-Ponty - The World of Perception and the World of Science (English Subtitles) Posted by: Eidos84 Video duration: 481 seconds Global video hits: 5343 "The World of Perception and the World of Science", the first of Maurice Merleau-Ponty's "Causeries" radio lecture series, broadcast on the 9th of October 1948. Translated and subtitled by Kris Pender. Related: merleau-ponty, english, subtitles, radio, lecture, causeries, world, of, perception, science, 1948 Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: Who can send me? ... By: Partenope81. on 01 Feb 12, 20:17:03 Who can send me? the text in english of this video? roxbency@virgilio.it. Thanks a lot Thanks so much for ... By: katerinaandriotis. on 31 Jan 12, 04:59:59 Thanks so much for these! I had requested them from INAtheque in Paris but they can't digitize on demand. Did you get them off? of FranceCulture that rebroadcasted them some time ago? (cont...) However, ... By: roryscanlon. on 09 Jan 12, 04:41:30 (cont...) However, this extra-reality of direct perception has nothing (Nothing!) to do with "opacity". We are not able to see by our eyes because it is dark... because light cannot penetrate--but rather because there is a more-than-objective light which shines in its immediacy? throughout all beings. This light, which enlightens situated subjects, allows things to retain their irreducible wholeness--their gestalt-form, or simply their reality: the table exists! (wonderful clip) "what is light? -- ... By: roryscanlon. on 09 Jan 12, 04:38:15 "what is light? --does one not ask a physicist?" ... "It is on the contrary, the law, which is an approximate expression of the physical event". Yes. yes. Fresh air, music to? the ears! (cont'd) This man makes no ... By: samdman1995. on 25 Oct 11, 00:25:10 This man makes no sense ? merci!? By: iampolsk. on 26 Aug 11, 15:59:04 merci!? I like. Its been ... By: wisdominnature7. on 12 Aug 11, 19:19:45 I like. Its been ages since I last? heard this. Your welcome. This ... By: Eidos84. on 12 Aug 11, 09:48:23 Your welcome. This is the entire recorded (first) lecture. These lectures were published in manuscript form in both English and French, but these texts included M-P's own notes, so there's more to these than the actual recordings themselves. Will be uploading the other lectures over the? coming weeks. Many, many thanks ... By: fcyeznikian. on 12 Aug 11, 09:31:16 Many, many thanks for sharing with? us this rare document. Could you please up load this lecture in its whole ? Wish you a nice day. Strange? - I just ... By: Ontologistics. on 11 Aug 11, 22:27:28 Strange? - I just finished reading this. Hubert Dreyfus on Embodiment (I-II) Posted by: 0ThouArtThat0 Video duration: 554 seconds Global video hits: 25453 Dreyfus talks about Merleau-Ponty and Heidegger in relation to Artificial Intelligence and the Internet. Related: mental, representation, philosophy, hubert, dreyfus, merleau-ponty, heidegger, artificial, intelligence, descartes Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: there's a nice ... By: psionicman. on 27 Jun 11, 07:06:55 there's a nice discussion about exactly that question in "in defense of lost causes" by slavoj zizek, in a chapter entitled "why heidegger took the right step but in the wrong direction in 1933". the quick version: yes, but much is salvageable. you can kind of get a sense of his opinion? on it in the youtube video "Zizek - Ecology: The New Opiate of the Masses (6 of 7)" which is mostly a question from an audience member re: heidegger and then zizek's reply. @AngryMrBubbles can ... By: oc00011. on 08 May 11, 14:36:03 @AngryMrBubbles can u please elaborate? i mean, philosophy and politics cannot be said to be unrelated. one must have influence on the other, surely..? for instance, he saw himself as a "philosopher king" as? envisioned by plato, but he exercised this in his politics, being on hitler's right hand. is heidegger's ... By: oc00011. on 19 Apr 11, 15:47:04 is heidegger's politics? (nazism) interwoven in his philosophy? Ponty is not the ... By: mach1man22. on 17 Mar 11, 08:15:26 Ponty is not the first to say that. Husserl said that things can appear "incomplete". As Ponty said , "You can see the house better from the back". Husserl came up with that notion first as he was the founder of Phenomenology. Lol Dreyfus? even gives Husserl's "incompleteness" example in his early interview with Brian Magee. yes, i read ... By: codylawrence100. on 17 Feb 11, 19:16:42 yes, i read numerous books by him in numerous classes on existential and phenomenology. he's? the top living expert and very insightful. Check out the ... By: lralon. on 15 Nov 10, 05:58:24 Check out the Figure/Ground interview series with renown media ecologists, phenomenologists, and philosophers of technology such Iain Thomson, Taylor Carman, Albert Borgmann, Don Ihde, Andrew Feenberg, and Eric McLuhan, among others: figureground dot? ca/interviews/ Yes. Yes. Yes. It's ... By: mach1man22. on 12 Oct 10, 01:58:49 Yes. Yes. Yes. It's amazing to me that see that as far into reality that the phenomenalists and existentialists took their inquiry and came back with conclusions that people? just do not understand how much closer this is to truth- validity- than psychology, biology, religion etc. I think you've ... By: gatkin123. on 10 Mar 10, 20:37:22 I think you've betrayed your "mood" if nothing else. I'm not a nihilist by any means...I think there's great meaning to be gained through aesthetic understanding. And I've gained more from H's notions of ready-at-hand and? presence-at-hand than any other philosopher I've read (including Nietzsche). You should ... By: gatkin123. on 10 Mar 10, 20:30:57 You should download? Dreyfus's lecture on Heidegger through ITunes. I think you've rushed to judgement here. frekin awesome... ... By: f1ghtclub2k3. on 28 Jan 10, 21:32:11 frekin awesome...yes? steps steps to a new experience. Lewclan, you have a ... By: emblemOFbeing. on 15 Nov 09, 08:42:37 Lewclan, you have a point. Still, Heidegger explicitly rejects? pragmatist philosophy in his interview with Der Spiegel. He would, I think, care about certain interpretations of his work. When did this? ... By: yamale53085. on 06 Nov 09, 04:50:12 When did this? interview take place? I never said ... By: Lewclan. on 20 May 09, 06:38:02 I never said anything about extermination, that is YOUR fanaticism leaking through. YOU are the one who? was talking about extermination. I never said I ... By: Lewclan. on 20 May 09, 06:27:16 I never said I would like to silence you. I said that people like you are what is wrong with the world. I will stick by that if you continue to act so aggressively and maliciously towards those who do not deserve it. Putting words in people's mouth and then knocking over the straw man you've constructed is a technique of the sham philosopher. Heidegger lived with the peasants. Even when? offered a teaching position in Berlin he refused, because he wished to stay in the country. Think about this. The man behind the ... By: rabmunch. on 08 May 09, 12:09:01 The man behind the name "Lewclan" would like tosilence people like me forever, since we "are what is wrong? with the world." If people like me, he is saying, could somehow be exterminated, the world could be rectified and even saved. This is almost the definition of man who is fanatic. In this case, fortunately, a merely private, impotent, and neurotic fanatic. I am speaking only ... By: rabmunch. on 08 May 09, 12:04:02 I am speaking only to? a few, a very few perhaps, who have the seriousness patient self-reflectiveness to think about nihilism. This should be a bridge to broader questions. Serious beginners might look at Allan Bloom's lectures on Nietzsche here on Youtube (recently put-up by someone who deserves thanks). Fanatics like Lewclan will always exist. It is necessary for us to think about what form fanaticisms take today: insane egalitarianism, for instance. [This too: said for the benefit of a few.] Either way, the act ... By: Lewclan. on 08 May 09, 02:28:24 Either way, the act of you posting comments reveals? that you care about the relationships you have between the "herd," "superficial men," and "youth." Otherwise, why would you try to derogate and attack other people's interpretations? You can't even respond to my post because doing so would only demonstrate the fact that you care about what I think - you have lost the game by playing it. Elitists like you are exactly what is wrong with the world. If you're just ... By: Lewclan. on 08 May 09, 02:27:29 If you're just trying to help us understand Heidegger better, because YOU care if Dreyfus gets Heidegger right or wrong (for some silly egoistic reason)? and YOU care if we understand it properly, then you could help us in a much more benevolent manner. Honestly, who cares ... By: Lewclan. on 08 May 09, 02:26:07 Honestly, who cares if Dreyfus gets it right? Do you think? Heidegger would care if people were getting him wrong? If you think Heidegger would take offense to the "herd" misunderstanding him then you obviously do not understand Heidegger. Do you not see the ridiculous irony in trying to prove that your interpretations of Heidegger are "right" and others are "wrong?" Honestly, who cares ... By: Lewclan. on 08 May 09, 02:23:52 Honestly, who cares if Dreyfus? gets it right? Do you think Heidegger would care if people were getting him wrong? If you think Heidegger would take offense to the "herd" misunderstanding him then you obviously do not understand Heidegger. Do you not see the ridiculous irony in trying to prove that your interpretations of Heidegger are "right" and others are "wrong?" it is in his ... By: humantechnology. on 03 Apr 09, 22:08:20 it is in his lecture? called "being-toward-death". available as podcast on the web. For the sake of an ... By: rabmunch. on 16 Oct 08, 23:12:16 For the sake of an example of a professor who cannot understand the core of Heidegger's thought. Dreyfus is not stupid. Rather, he is extremely shallow. Shallowness prevent? access to Heidegger's thought. Dreyfus (in his conversations with Magee) also fails to grasp the core of Husserl's reflections. If one want to understand these thinkers it helps to read Leo Strauss. Goto -> internet archive[dot]org and there are several fundamental texts by Strauss on Heidegger & Husserl. Tell me Shoo Shoo: ... By: rabmunch. on 16 Oct 08, 23:04:46 Tell me Shoo Shoo: How do your interests in Rock n'Roll, Heidegger, and Dreyfus complement one another? Heidegger despised youth like yourself. Did you know that? He would have considered today's youth the offspring of last men, and deserving of extermination. His manner of? thinking was closely allied with what he called "the inner truth and greatness of National Socialism." (1953) Few are willing to accept or believe the necessary consistency in this dimension of his thought. I believe the latin ... By: ponsasinorum. on 16 Oct 08, 22:02:21 I believe the latin abbreviation you are searching for here is e.g.? rabmuch: you are - ... By: xiuxiu12. on 09 Oct 08, 00:17:21 rabmuch: you are - totally - full of shit AND yourself, if there is a difference between the two.? Merleau-Ponty - Sensible Objects (English Subtitles) Posted by: Eidos84 Video duration: 410 seconds Global video hits: 3459 "Exploration of the Perceived World: Sensible Objects", the third of Merleau-Ponty's 1948 radio lecture series. Translated and subtitled by Kris Pender Related: merleau-ponty, english, subtitles, exploration, of, the, perceived, world, sensible, objects, causeries, 1948, sartre Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: What is this ... By: roryscanlon. on 26 May 12, 05:57:37 What is this difference? Isn't the abstracted yellow the same? as the yellow of the lemon experienced by the eye? yeah, you can ... By: ddaa8282. on 26 May 12, 02:57:50 yeah, you can abstract it, but then it's not the yellow you see in the lemon anymore, it's a representation, that's the point. there's difference between experience - our way of coping with the world -, and representation - the product of reflexion. and yes, Merleau-Ponty does think there? is a factual world inalienable and not reducible to representations. But yellow can be ... By: roryscanlon. on 25 May 12, 21:33:34 But yellow can be abstracted. I've just imagined several different shades of? yellow. There is no yellow object inside of my head. I've abstracted the yellow from experience. How else could I recognize several different objects are all yellow? If the meaningful core guarantees inter-sensorial unity, it must be supra-sensorial. There must be a real lemon apart from my sight of it--other than myself--an inextinguishable reality beyond my experience. A reality from which the order of exp. comes. But he qualities ... By: ddaa8282. on 25 May 12, 10:07:30 But he qualities aprehended in these fields are all connected by a "meaningful core", which garantees the "intersensorial unity" of experience. For instance, in this case the meaningful core could be that it is a lemon (jointly with any other specific meanings a lemon might have to you). He specifically states that no experience can be reduced to? a "quality", thus I'm pretty sure he would agree with you that there's more to lemon than yellow. I don't think he ... By: ddaa8282. on 25 May 12, 10:07:16 I don't think he means yellow as an abstract quality, I think what he means is that the experience of the yellow in the lemon is not "abstractable" from the experience of the lemon itself. Merleau-Ponty argues for an continued experience through the senses, redefining the senses as recognizable "fields" in our perception of the world, defined in relation to parts of our body (e.g. there's a visual field, defined? in relation to our eyes). Turned philosophy ... By: shoujokakumei39. on 31 Jan 12, 06:30:45 Turned philosophy on its head. Bad attempt at punning :p He was an amazing? lecturer! Thank you for these ... By: roryscanlon. on 09 Jan 12, 05:39:21 Thank you for these lectures. The metaphor of honey is simply delicious. And by Ponty's reasoning we should say that stained-glass windows are sweet--so apt! However, of course, it is not true that each quality is the whole. Yellow is not the lemon. Rather, The lemon is yellow. If there is to be an? absolute unity of qualities such that each penetrates and satisfies each other, it must be in a transcendent whole: the being of the thing, its "creatio". Or, there's more to lemon than yellow. What a shame. The ... By: fildisenia. on 20 Oct 11, 21:04:16 What a shame. The world? is full of hidden treasures however, so who knows? Perhaps one day.. As far as I know ... By: Eidos84. on 20 Oct 11, 08:09:54 As far as I know there is no video footage of M-P...but I'm? always searching! What a gift eidos84 ... By: fildisenia. on 19 Oct 11, 20:56:33 What a gift eidos84!! Thank you! Do? you know if there are any videos of Merleau? Fantastico? ! ... By: fcyeznikian. on 25 Aug 11, 23:34:28 Fantastico? ! Thanks a lot... wwwhhhhaaattt?!??!? ... By: emblemOFbeing. on 25 Aug 11, 22:50:20 wwwhhhhaaattt?!??!?! yes!!? Merleau-Ponty and the Body Posted by: redliterocket4 Video duration: 415 seconds Global video hits: 10307 The body is completely unobjectifiable! What are the philosophical consequences? Related: merleau-ponty, phenomenology, perception, existentialism, body, dualism, objectify, science Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: And please, dearest ... By: patternsinchaos. on 10 May 12, 08:33:57 And please, dearest Matthew, work with this mirror. v=cTo1Rtf3ZbA? So consider the ... By: astrotometry. on 09 May 12, 09:16:26 So consider the Sun? as the sort of mirror Merlu-Ponty describes, but of an entire day of time and from "every perspective", and our moments as being individual reflections within a great hall of many such "mirrors". rite?? By: Davidkira1990. on 30 Apr 12, 17:25:07 rite?? since we don't know ... By: Davidkira1990. on 30 Apr 12, 17:24:37 since we don't know that we don't know something; if we don't know it to begin with* hence...? so merleau ponty ... By: Davidkira1990. on 30 Apr 12, 17:23:05 so merleau ponty says that we perceive the world as an interpretation right? so in essence, what we are feeling and knowing is not the raw reality of things; its how we put it in to human perspective. sense we can know that we don't know something if we don't know it. basically the? world has many faces, many level of interpretation and we as humans with our biological sense n technology can only see part of it. In his later ... By: uremove. on 11 Sep 11, 16:19:23 In his later unfinished "The Visible & Invisible", MP talks about the "Chiasm". As "flesh", we experience the chiasm between the body as object (which can touch & be touched) and as subject (who feels the touch). It sounds like this is what you are also describing from PP. What? I find fascinating in MP, which fits in with QM, is his idea that there is no pre-determined "world-in-itself". We determine the undetermined world through our perception. We collapse the Schroedinger wave function. the body is not ... By: baermtn. on 08 Jun 10, 19:11:36 the body is not objectifiable because there is no point from which we are split from it.? it's not that my perception or perspective is constituting the world -- there are 'objects', but not in opposition to 'subject'. well, i don't think ... By: baermtn. on 08 Jun 10, 19:04:33 well, i don't think merleau-ponty is leaning toward kantian idealism,? the kind that says man constitutes his perceptions and comes to know the world in that way. instead, i think merleau-ponty is looking to break the barrier between such subject/object splits and dualities. he is looking, in my naive reading, to re-integrate the subject in the world of objects -- the experience of mind is not split from the world, but rather can only be a mind if it is engaged and immersed as part of it. Don't slip into ... By: 2506TJB. on 27 Apr 10, 05:43:32 Don't slip into solipsism, and I'm not sure if you are, but it seems like you may be leaning there. The idea of the Subject from a phenomenological standpoint is not the same Cogito that Descartes wrote about. The world isn't something that is existing as "I" constitute it, because the world presents itself to me already constituted. My body is my means of engagement with this world, so my perception is? the world itself. I extract meaning out of the world based on my perceptual awareness of it. horizon of? ... By: Israe5l. on 25 Jun 09, 03:58:42 horizon of? perceptional experience can lead us to pain, tho. Because, we are only given finite concrete instances. we are given a lot of "phenomenology" and construct one's own world. "phenomenology" has a lot of baggage (not all bad. such as "written by European philosophers"). Let me repeat, from the "phenomenological" instances we jump to "phenomenological" world. The instances I do not object. But "phenomenology" is open to all sorts of readings. (all of them can be correct.) I don't know if ... By: sunsh1ne22. on 02 May 09, 00:28:02 I don't know if you? truly understand what Merleau-Ponty is saying in his lectures. M-P mentions mirrors when referring to the way classical, or Renaissance art depicts objects. He mentions this to make a point about the way modern art does not resemble or "mirror" what the artist sees when he or she paints. This point is made in the claim that modern art reveals something to the viewer in a way that philosophy does to the reader. Re-read Lectures 1 and 2 from "The World of Perception." There is an almost ... By: theprophet20. on 23 Feb 09, 13:13:35 There is an almost uncanny similarity of this channel's originator with that of another young man, that of the guitaoist channel.? Both are around the same age, both have broadly similar interests, both have read widely and both are possibly of the same ethnicity? A Cosmic coincidence? I find Merleau ... By: theprophet20. on 23 Feb 09, 13:06:36 I find Merleau Ponty fascinating, the little I've read of him. In particular I love that section of the Phenomenology of Perception dealing with night and dreams, which is almost poetic... Regarding how we peceive our own bodies, it's occurred to me that identical twins are the only people who really know how they appear to other people. Because as Merleau Ponty pointed out, we don't get a true impression of ourselves from mirror images. They can see? themselves in the round, as it were. Interesting stuff. ... By: HaleyMary. on 09 Nov 08, 17:10:19 Interesting stuff. I'll have to read some Merleau-Ponty sometime. The? part of looking into the mirror and seeing an imitation of self and the body not being able to be objectified makes me think of how everyone can have their own perception of everyone else. Not like people are judging others, but just that everyone has their own point of view of the world. It isn't really ... By: wgaule. on 22 Sep 08, 02:11:31 It isn't really fragmented though, is it; because this implies that it is broken up and proportioned out, and so the bit I have, no one else can.? So we can all perceive without taking away from the whole. The world is not? ... By: atolborg. on 18 May 08, 13:56:39 The world is not? the totality of selfsufficient substances, but rather the experience we have of the world while we are caught up in careful acting in it. Merleau Ponty is ... By: atolborg. on 18 May 08, 13:55:36 Merleau Ponty is together Heidegger no very fond of the mindbody dualism. There "real" world? which you talk about - the it world - IS the world u perceive. Your perspective is not some kind of illusion, but rather, your horizon of experience lets you pull forth different stuff from the world - you see the chair, and is able to decide where the chairs begins and ends ie. Ponty is suggesting ... By: redliterocket4. on 29 Mar 08, 00:37:30 Ponty is suggesting that the assumptions a scientist makes about objectivity are false. The world we perceive? and act in is not the world as such, but the world as our bodies can relate to it. I have not read Ponty's take on quantum physics, but I am guessing he would take an approach more like the Copenhagen interpretation, specifically Heisenberg's idea that physicists do not investigate reality itself, they investigate what we can say about reality. Ok.....i have been ... By: argenys. on 28 Mar 08, 22:47:27 Ok.....i have been doing alot of reading about quantum mechanics and have made my own conclusions about spirituality, i do not believe in religion but? i have got an intrest in "kabbalah" wich is not a religion......and what you are saying interests me...and would like to ask you if you could give me a better "idea: of what merleau is speaking about....because this gives me the sence that the whole "uncertantly principle" in quantum mechanics may agree with this view...but i still cannot grasp it perception should ... By: 4gelassenheit. on 02 Feb 08, 08:01:22 perception should be interpreted through feelings or moods because? they seem to be more pervasive than sensory perception, as such bodies seemingly cannot be objectified in the ordinary standards of the word. so from moods..obviously heidegger and his work in div I reaches ponty's phenomenology profoundly. definitely a warranted attempt at educating..i thank you. wish i had more room and words to clarify what it si im writing about. :) peace in your endeavors Here you are again, ... By: cosabio. on 03 Oct 07, 05:39:55 Here you are again, mining the diamonds. "Resistance in the variations of perspective gives rise to perception." So might our experience without this resistance be more like McKenna's DMT hyperspace? (I'm not suggesting you try it.) Thanks again,? Matt. I also see the ... By: bachilard. on 22 Jun 07, 02:09:14 I also see the benevelent side of it. It's just that animosity shocks me? more than the other. The world of world wide web pretty much reflects the world that we are living. It's the same people in this earth express their ideas and emotion, only without subtlty. Everything is maganified. Continue-- Just ... By: bachilard. on 15 Jun 07, 06:55:11 Continue-- Just becoming youtuber days ago, I am shocked by the hostility of some youtubers towards the other. So there is some reality in Sartre's descrption of antegomy between self and the other. Yet, MP povides a picture of a better world. I guess that's part of your project--to change the world. But if human cannot deal with their anxiety, we're still very far away from? there. Hubert Dreyfus on Merleau-Ponty, Part 2/2 Posted by: hiperf289 Video duration: 635 seconds Global video hits: 2288 UC Berkeley philosophy professor Dreyfus discusses the importance of Merleau-Ponty's renowned focus on the "body" to "grip" reality's "gestalt" for "skillful coping" ... for Merleau-Ponty it is the our physical body with its "skills" that allow us to "relate to things" and others via "intercorporeality" which is deemed "magical" ... the body is always "geared" toward the world... Related: merleau-ponty, hubert, dreyfus, french, philosophy, phenomenology Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: Rhythm and Animality in Merleau-Ponty's Ontology of the Flesh Posted by: Eidos84 Video duration: 6303 seconds Global video hits: 4675 Daniela Vallega-Neu - "On Rhythm and Animality in Merleau-Ponty's Ontology of the Flesh". April, 12 2007. *Cleaned up the audio as best I could. Turn down the volume to cut out background noise. Related: merleau, ponty, phenomenology, ontology, perception, rhythm, animality, body, flesh Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: Thank? you for the ... By: Sigena6666. on 22 Apr 11, 00:53:37 Thank? you for the post Thank? you. By: taratasarar. on 18 Jan 11, 23:44:29 Thank? you. WHOOP WHOOP Merleau ... By: drgdrf. on 18 Jan 11, 04:39:38 WHOOP WHOOP Merleau-Ponty fuck yeah? Merleau-Ponty - Exploration of the Perceived World: Space (English Subtitles) Posted by: Eidos84 Video duration: 569 seconds Global video hits: 2032 "Exploration of the Perceived World: Space", the second of Merleau-Ponty's 1948 "Causeries" radio lecture series. Translated and subtitled by Kris Pender. Related: merleau-ponty, english, subtitles, exploration, of, the, perceived, world, space, art, philosophy, science, psychology, cezanne Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: (cont'd) It is not ... By: roryscanlon. on 09 Jan 12, 04:26:57 (cont'd) It is not necessary to choose between classical perspectivism and modern points-of-view. Is it? There is a perspective--a pure space, along which all relations flows. But this perspective runs through (within) all subjects' points of view. "Being reveals itself through time." The pure? perspective must still be open... within this "revealing." For instance, he is certainly wrong that perspective is unnatural--for sometimes things do present themselves as an entire group. Brilliant. ... By: roryscanlon. on 09 Jan 12, 04:22:12 Brilliant. Wonderful. Especially when he says that? modern painting gives us a field of objects which are only ever seen one at a time, each as its own resting-place for vision (almost as its own self), with a "fixed gaze." This makes the field of the painting fundamentally dynamic, composed of relationships, and not the inert space of classical perspective. very perceptive--a joy to hear. However, he goes too far, I think. (cont...) thanks a lot, I ... By: FredeGF. on 18 Nov 11, 12:41:58 thanks a lot, I very? much enjoy this - and please no dub! Wonderful to hear ... By: rfalisze. on 17 Nov 11, 19:56:09 Wonderful to hear his voice indeed! Wonderful to hear him speak to a common audience - works as a nice summary and introduction to some of the main points in the (much less accessible) Phenomenology of Perception. Please keep uploading these lectures, Kris - you're doing? a fine job of translating! (Also - are the lectures only 10 minutes each? Or are you editing them? Don't be afraid to post them whole!) It is wonderful? to ... By: fildisenia. on 19 Oct 11, 20:57:57 It is wonderful? to hear Merleau's VOICE. No dub please. Thank you very much ... By: fcyeznikian. on 15 Aug 11, 13:55:04 Thank you very much again? ! A dubbed English ... By: HebaruSan. on 14 Aug 11, 19:33:34 A dubbed English voiceover would? make this easier to follow. Merleau-Ponty - Animality (English Subtitles) Posted by: Eidos84 Video duration: 519 seconds Global video hits: 1496 "Exploration of the Perceived World: Animality", from Merleau-Ponty's "Causeries" radio lectures. Translated and subtitled by Kris Pender Related: merleau-ponty, english, subtitles, exploration, of, the, perceived, world, animality, causeries, 1948 Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: Claudel is ... By: roryscanlon. on 09 Jan 12, 05:57:44 Claudel is wonderful though. In fact, to further the point, Jesus Christ, in Revelation, is seen in a vision? as the lamb. Yes, classical ... By: roryscanlon. on 09 Jan 12, 05:50:12 Yes, classical humanism was "dehumanizing," deforming, towards the whole external world (even children). But Ponty lies in his reach back to theology. It is precisely because classical thought turned its back on God, and thereby any source of personality greater than the "healthy adult man" that the absurd choice of the simply normal adult or the absurd outsider? was foisted open us! "Rights" are the problem, not Divinity! The French treat Christianity as mere pretext for Descartes! Its nuts! Merleau-Ponty Posted by: cdrew1 Video duration: 382 seconds Global video hits: 1356 Discussion of Merleau-Ponty Related: merleau-ponty, drew, dissertation, play, body, as, expression, speech Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: Maurice Merleau-Ponty and Existentialism Posted by: ameliaousley Video duration: 137 seconds Global video hits: 3775 AP World Lit. Semester 1 Final Related: movie, 1 Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: I like the fact ... By: uremove. on 11 Sep 11, 12:14:25 I like the fact that you make a very entertaining video on Merleau-Ponty, an important? philosopher very few people have heard of! You are right that previous experiences becomes integral to our perception of e.g. an apple. MP would say that our perception of a chair carries not just colour, but an implicit solicitation for us to sit on it, or the apple to eat it. We determine the chair or apple as whole gestalts in the world, we don't build an image up from isolated sensory data (eg colour). Yeah, wow. I'm ... By: vanchronos. on 17 Jul 11, 08:18:09 Yeah, wow. I'm sorry to say that you got it wrong for the most part. ? I give you max points for trying to read and present the ideas of this very challenging and original existential-phenomenologist, I wouldn't have the guts to make a video on it. This is your AP ... By: emblemOFbeing. on 06 Feb 11, 05:37:02 This is your AP final? You fail, sorry. Some? of what you've expressed here is either the opposite of MP's views or irrelevant. Could you cite the example of the inverted colors or how intersubjectivity in fact makes perception entirely subjective and yet at the same time somehow dependent on what is merely 'popular'? Merleau-Ponty - Man Seen from the Outside (English Subtitles) Posted by: Eidos84 Video duration: 471 seconds Global video hits: 894 "Man Seen from the Outside", from Merleau-Ponty's "Causeries" radio lectures. Translated by Kris Pender. Related: merleau-ponty, man, seen, from, the, outside, english, subtitles, causeries Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: bloody hell, I ... By: IMOLEGREGG. on 09 Mar 12, 23:28:44 bloody hell, I agree with someone on youtube, better look? out of the window and see if the sky is rolling itself up! Mind matters, ergo matter is mind. Fair enough, but it ... By: IMOLEGREGG. on 09 Mar 12, 23:28:33 Fair enough, but it is fair to say much of what he said was measured against the very real? possiblity for him of being burned at the stake. But this is not ... By: roryscanlon. on 10 Jan 12, 05:01:14 But this is not true! not true! If anger and early psychology can't be reduced to one's inner mind, nor to bodily manifestations, this is a sign of a commonly held human nature: by which anger can be seen as a manifestation of a mind at all. It means that the "cogito" itself is shared, is universal in the widest sense. Interiority is not reduced to? a "critical moment" (which would be without truth) but deepened to include the other. And when we speak to someone, we see them from the Inside! These days i am ... By: LilachLavy. on 08 Jan 12, 03:48:37 These days i am just? trying to understand Ponty....this was quite helpful, hearing his speech is different than reading about him. Thanks It's not? hard to ... By: metal87power. on 06 Jan 12, 18:11:07 It's not? hard to criticize Descartes. At 6:01 Ponty uses ... By: pawsoned. on 05 Jan 12, 21:46:48 At 6:01 Ponty uses the phrase "the pure self, a mind without body", which reminds me of Deleuze's concept of body without organs. I wonder if there might be some similarity between those two terms. Another remark that came up while listening? to this lecture was that perhaps Paul Ricoeur's book "Oneself as another" develops further this philosophy. Anyway, interesting lecture. thanks for the upload Merleau-Ponty Posted by: cdrew1 Video duration: 437 seconds Global video hits: 4208 Discussion of Merleau-Ponty Related: merleau-ponty, drew, dissertation, play, body, as, expression, speech Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: 5:05 - wish I'd ... By: emblemOFbeing. on 08 Jun 10, 19:18:12 5:05 - wish I'd been here 2 years earlier or you'd started reading? this 2 years later. Oh well, hope you're still enjoying Merleau-Ponty. What he's saying in ... By: 2506TJB. on 26 Apr 10, 19:16:25 What he's saying in that first excerpt, is that? meaning itself transcends the word that is used to express it. The meaning must be deduced by using more than just the word, but also personal gestures used with it. With Merleau-Ponty it always reverts back to the basic concept of being-in-the-world. That is the main idea he took from Heidegger and that is what he is constantly improving upon. Meaning is already constituted for us within our world, and it is up to us as the subject to express it. Sports and ... By: Israe5l. on 24 Jul 08, 03:26:52 Sports and philosophy. Crying good idea. Used to run track? and the track was a pure unprobablamatic space which is the function of bodily experience. Mind extends out. Merleau-Ponty on Organisms as Autonomous Systems & Motor Intentionality Posted by: emblemOFbeing Video duration: 885 seconds Global video hits: 259 from Merleau-Ponty's earliest, major work, "the structure of behavior" (1935/1963 p. 13) -- if you want to read along, this passage is quoted in Evan Thompson's book 'Mind in Life': [ books.google.com ] Already watched my last video on Merleau-Ponty? I'd skip to the 5:11 mark. The reading starts around 7:55 Related: merleau-ponty, freedom, free-will, free, will, phenomenology, phenomenological, husserl, philosophy, philosophical, being-in-the-world, heidegger, dialectic, dialectical, agency, social, society, situation, situated, existential, existence, sartre, consciousness, mind, cognitive, cognition, embodied, bodily, embodiment, gestalt, structure, behavior, organism, umwelt, goldstein, enaction, enactive Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: A phenomenology of ... By: Israe5l. on 28 Jan 11, 03:56:20 A phenomenology of submission. When your employer tells you do so something. You do it. But there is a sense in which you are willing to do it or do it but with very much a resistence. One is active and the other? is passive. We all want to do things actively. When one is doing by active willingness one is not causally driven. One is part with the organization that one is working with. When one is working passively one is a machine. Good vid? By: alteringenting. on 21 Jan 11, 10:16:24 Good vid? Thank you? for ... By: f417h2GRACE. on 05 Jan 11, 04:42:10 Thank you? for links much appreciated Merleau-Ponty on Freedom & free will as situated, social-historical, existential Posted by: emblemOFbeing Video duration: 875 seconds Global video hits: 510 from Phenomenology of Perception by Maurice Merleau-Ponty (2002) p. 527-8 or page 404 in an earlier edition which can be read via google books: books.google.com Related: merleau-ponty, freedom, free-will, free, will, phenomenology, phenomenological, husserl, philosophy, philosophical, being-in-the-world, heidegger, dialectic, dialectical, agency, social, society, situation, situated, existential, existence, sartre, consciousness, mind, cognitive, cognition, embodied, bodily, embodiment Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: ? By: Israe5l. on 04 Feb 11, 22:30:24 ? hum. Total choice ... By: Israe5l. on 30 Jan 11, 01:56:44 hum. Total choice or no choice at all. And the subject decides between the two in the moment. There is the dichotomy of time:? past, present, and future. Past is man's memory. Present is the accumilation senses (or as you said choice). And the future is the construction of mental operation or nothing at all. I liked it! Thumbs ... By: kakosuranosx. on 10 Jan 11, 05:16:56 I liked it! Thumbs up! :)? Merleau-Ponty: classical logic, pointilistic time, the objective world. Posted by: emblemOFbeing Video duration: 598 seconds Global video hits: 259 A reading from, and some rambling about, Merleau-Ponty's Phenomenology of Perception. Related: merleau-ponty, phenomenology, time, world, logic, perception, temporality Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: You've got nothing ... By: silversoul7. on 22 Jan 10, 06:38:31 You've got nothing on me when it comes to? stuttering. I enjoy your videos just fine. Merleau-Ponty II Posted by: cdrew1 Video duration: 526 seconds Global video hits: 398 Discussion of Merleau-Ponty cont Related: merleau-ponty, drew, dissertation, play, body, as, expression, speech Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: good job man. ... By: mrfatd. on 13 Sep 09, 12:41:10 good job man. sports? and philosophjy are the best things you can do Re: Merleau-Ponty and Theory of Mind - a follow up to my first video, general discussion. Posted by: 0ThouArtThat0 Video duration: 542 seconds Global video hits: 1890 Video Cam Direct Upload Related: theory of mind, simulation theory, theory theory, vorhabe, narrative Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: do you study ... By: Shadapaga. on 15 Mar 11, 19:09:02 do you study philosophy? at UCF? Man, you are so ... By: miguelbinha. on 22 Nov 10, 22:59:18 Man, you are so eloquent! Isn't this amazing? To question and not be afraid to be vulnerable. To? be open and authentic. Man, you are my reconnection to what is essential whenever the caves' shackles tighten up! I come to Youtube and hear you and remember who I really am. What? is it that is ... By: 2levina. on 03 Oct 10, 19:55:18 What? is it that is meant by 'The Look' in phenomenology (in the sense of, 'who is it that is before me, who is this other?' thank you for the? ... By: egoistorms. on 18 May 10, 06:12:40 thank you for the? content Do you know about ... By: Aspie37. on 30 Jan 10, 00:40:14 Do you know about Asperger Syndrome?? How amusing. I just ... By: atolborg. on 07 Jan 10, 01:50:12 How amusing. I just "criticized" your video reply on God for being too artistic. Now I watch this video where your style is different :) Do you relate to "emergence of multiple selves" given multiple situations? Do you relate to the idea of us suffering from change blindness in relation to the emergence of our self. That in some way it is misjudging to speak of "a particular self"? And that it is more suitable to say that we bring forth suited selves to deal with (the? breakdowns of) the world? I do? find it quite ... By: peace97914101. on 11 Dec 09, 14:53:23 I do? find it quite funny that people base their existance off a machine. A computer. A robot. Not a smart idea I would say. So let me ask you ... By: peace97914101. on 11 Dec 09, 14:30:28 So let me ask you something else son. So when my friends get on here and start using this site., and? they do not act or speak the way you dictate as they should are you going to say the same things. Are you going to assume as to people and there mental state or expression? Hmmmm? Seems to me that you will. If you want me to ... By: peace97914101. on 11 Dec 09, 14:13:49 If you want me to like you MaBu888 you will learn? how to keep that trap of yours closed. Shall I post ... By: peace97914101. on 11 Dec 09, 14:11:30 Shall I post flowers and kittens for you so you? feel more safe? Is that real, or just another lie to make you feel better about your self MaBu888. As I said before ... By: peace97914101. on 11 Dec 09, 14:10:17 As I said before kiddo, you can even come close to walking the miles in my shoes. You have no idea what I have? seen and gone through over this. And when it is told to you, you sit there making even more non sense believing that you have some idea or answer to this, or what I should do. Guess what I am doing what I was taught and told kiddo. Deal with it. No if you want to ... By: peace97914101. on 11 Dec 09, 14:08:00 No if you want to know what I am upset about just ask me foolish. And so I will enlighten or ignorant mind. What? I don't like is waking up everyday to the same old BS repitive job or jobs. Putting products into peoples homes, which I know do more harm than good. What I am upset about, is people like your self who claim to be intellectiual and you do not think about the world around you and the people in it which make it function. You yourself cause ... By: MaBu888. on 11 Dec 09, 14:00:01 You yourself cause negative? reactions with your own negative reactions. Man? the phone is ... By: peace97914101. on 11 Dec 09, 13:49:18 Man? the phone is not to good for these replies. /watch?v= ... By: peace97914101. on 11 Dec 09, 13:41:27 /watch?v=Pl2ff0yEqcE# let me tell you something kid, do you just like I remember what you have just said today, or what you have soon and proved in the past.? MaBu888 the person who has some major issues is you kiddo. And your langange proved it today alone. So you go and take what you said to sonsei SMS show him what you wrote before talking about someones attiutude or mental state kiddo. Now see, we adults ... By: peace97914101. on 11 Dec 09, 13:09:34 Now see, we adults do this thing called going to work. I? have to get ready, you sit back at thing about what I said today son. You kids will learn ... By: peace97914101. on 11 Dec 09, 13:06:59 You kids will learn how to follow directions, and if you cant welp then, Have fun searching and doing whatever? it is you think your doing out here. So if I do not? ... By: peace97914101. on 11 Dec 09, 13:05:54 So if I do not? know you, or trust you your responds is irrelevant. No Ring Ring, on? ... By: peace97914101. on 11 Dec 09, 13:05:16 No Ring Ring, on? the telephone means, I dont trust a single thing you say, nor believe any of it. Your comment, means to me about as much as a pile of garbage right now, since you do not know me, my expressions, or my emotional state kiddo. I merely responded ... By: MaBu888. on 11 Dec 09, 13:02:40 I merely responded to your expressions. I didn't even try? to assume what you feel or know, just how you said it. And here is what I ... By: peace97914101. on 11 Dec 09, 13:02:23 And here is what I see. The internet. Has not changed since Sep 11, 2001. Has not changed since the creation of this site 2005, and has not changed to much in 2009. People running around doing the same thing day in and day out. You cant follow a simple direction, then you want meaning to be brought to what you say out here, when I clearly define why, what most of you say or put up on this site means about squat to? me. See I empower the words of those I choose, not you Kiddo. Same back at you, ... By: MaBu888. on 11 Dec 09, 12:51:39 Same back at you, peace97914101. I speak what I? see. So as you blast all ... By: peace97914101. on 11 Dec 09, 12:47:32 So as you blast all those negitave words on this site, how does that make you feel? ? Did you learn that in your martial arts class, maybe you should speak that way to your sinsei. What having a? hard ... By: peace97914101. on 11 Dec 09, 12:45:00 What having a? hard time understanding, what you say, and what you believe is not what I say and believe. You are now free kiddo, stop trying to speak for me, and what I feel, and what I know. Wow, I just woke up ... By: peace97914101. on 11 Dec 09, 12:43:54 Wow, I just woke up and I dont use the? language you have just used. Maybe a bit more of meditation for you is needed. I am not upset, I am getting ready for work. Merleau-Ponty: classical logic and objective time 2 of ?? Posted by: emblemOFbeing Video duration: 598 seconds Global video hits: 205 a continuation of this video: www.youtube.com "the ideal of objective thought is both BASED UPON and RUINED BY temporality" -- nice, nice. Related: relativistic, skepticism, merleau-ponty, phenomenology, knowledge, perception Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: OK, now I know what ... By: Israe5l. on 10 Feb 10, 02:28:40 OK, now I know what I was trying to say. The issue is not truth but something new. Arithemetic is? all old hat. Its true but not new. Something about phenoemenology strikes me as trivial. But in being trivial its not trivial. Just like 3+7=10. Its trivial. But the importance may be somewhere else. Maybe you are counting candys for a child. And you had 3 candys and 7 candys total 10. Its trivial but not in the situation. With "fiction", I ... By: Israe5l. on 09 Feb 10, 17:13:43 With "fiction", I think I have mislead you. I don't mean contradiction or something that can not be? true. Athough contradiction and nontruth is not part of "ficiton". I meant only that something that hasn't happend (not like History). That is not dependent on something else. Need not be truthful to, say, history. I am not sure "3+7=10" is a metaphor. Its only an example. Above quote was p. ... By: emblemOFbeing. on 09 Feb 10, 00:18:11 Above quote was p. 362, in the 2002 trans.: I experience the unity of the world as I recognize a style. Yet even so, the style of a person..does not remain constant for me. After 10 years of friendship, even independently of any changes brought about by age, I seem to be dealing w/ a different person... Yet it is *only the knowledge of things* which varies? [not the world itself]..The world..is that permanent being...which attracts my activity toward the truth through appearance and error, pg 382 Yet MP holds that ... By: emblemOFbeing. on 09 Feb 10, 00:10:54 Yet MP holds that there is an unchanging-ness to the world "Our perception in its entirety is animated by a logic which assigns to each object its determinate features in virtue of those of the rest, and which 'cancel out' as unreal all stray data; it is entirely sustained by the certainty of the world. The constancy of colour is only an abstract component of the constancy of things, which in turn? is grounded in *the primordial constancy of the world* as the horizon of all our experiences." Interesting, it is ... By: emblemOFbeing. on 09 Feb 10, 00:01:28 Interesting, it is precisely Hegel's "absolute knowledge" and theoretical closure motivated by his "scientism" which MP objects to, of course. For MP, things themselves show themselves ALWAYS from a historically mediated, factical, embodied, contextualized,? present situation - so our 'finite' grasp of the particulars does not preclude 'truth' but serves to *reveal* ever *new aspects* of reality, creating ever new needs for and possibilities of interpretation given our ever-changing entanglement @dospook Having ... By: emblemOFbeing. on 08 Feb 10, 23:44:05 @dospook Having seen your videos, I have a suspicion you're a rather rigorous and mature thinker (meaning I agree with your views since they are somewhat similar to my own....heheh). So would you please, if you can, make a video outlining your questions and your points in more detail?? I might agree with you, but then I'd just need to clarify MP's position further to mediate this interpretation into understanding - otherwise you may have actually found a legit. mistake made by MP here. ...you say he does ... By: emblemOFbeing. on 08 Feb 10, 23:38:57 ...you say he does not touch truth OR speaks truth, but trivial truths (like 3+7=10, in your comment). If trivial truth, how could you fail to grasp it? Lets rule this out, then. By "putting" your mind "in" an other's, I assume you? mean "relate to their work" or "understand" in some way. Q: How? Well, if you cannot relate or understand, how can you make such truth judgments? Judgments of significance or triviality? Perhaps you've already outrun the devil with the speed of your judgment. Why and how shall ... By: emblemOFbeing. on 08 Feb 10, 23:34:07 Why and how shall we say: phenomenology "writes philosophical fictions" and fails to "touch truth" when we're unable to put our "minds in theirs"? Q: Why? Is it *because* you cannot? "put" your mind "in" Merleau-Ponty's mind that you judge him as not "touching truth" and such? It seems to me that you not only misunderstand Merleau-Ponty with your arithmetic metaphor of 3+7=10 (For he is arguing against such objective, one-answer-and-one-answer-only views) but also... Phenomenologists ... By: Israe5l. on 25 Jan 10, 03:19:04 Phenomenologists seems to be writing philosophical fictions. They don't touch truth, and yet they don't talk abstract non-sense. I don't seem to be able to put my mind in theirs. And I am not sure if I am useing their vocabulary the way they mean. Or phenomenolog is like: 3+7=10. Its true alright but trivial. But I also believe, we may be able to? out run the devil with our speed of writing. Perhaps a ... By: 0ThouArtThat0. on 24 Jan 10, 00:22:49 Perhaps a representational knowledge (i.e., impersonal, objective) of the whole? is only abstractly possible, but one could read Hegel's thought as a participatory approach not unlike what MP suggests. Hegel is always criticizing the view (Schelling) that the Absolute can be known as mere general formalism, pointing instead to engaging "the life of objects" in their concrete and particular immanence as the only path to knowledge. I think Hegel's ... By: 0ThouArtThat0. on 24 Jan 10, 00:17:27 I think Hegel's early period (before the "Phenomenology") represents a more fruitful direction than his later approach toward? absolute knowledge only through philosophy. He writes (approx. 1801), for instance, "I am now convinced that the highest act of Reason, the one through which it encompasses all Ideas, is an aesthetic act, and that truth and goodness only become sisters in beauty--the philosopher must possess just as much aesthetic power as the poet." Ponty replaces sum ... By: dospook. on 22 Jan 10, 23:05:47 Ponty replaces sum/totality of present w/ 'living present'? Staten may sum "living presence" w/ total panorama of presence as 'the divine eye' from which one would b blinded by too much light, too much data Which ponty iterates: "A sum of things & of presence makes non-sense" turns into A historical inherited "living present" "Projection" substitutes "sum" Ponty then uses Object as if instance was an object Instead of non-object or metaphor of spatial object. Same? issue different semantics Merleau-Ponty is ... By: emblemOFbeing. on 22 Jan 10, 13:43:21 Merleau-Ponty is not denying the possibility of knowing, even "truly" (taken in a certain sense). For him being-in-the-world is indistinguishable from being-in-truth, participation in the world,? his term is "contact". "What I discover and recognize through the cogito...is the deep-seated momentum of transcendence, which is my very being, the simultaneous contact with my own being and with the world's being." (PP 2002, 438-9) He IS criticizing any 'primacy' of impersonal, 'objective knowledge'. I cannot, w/ Hegel ... By: emblemOFbeing. on 22 Jan 10, 10:19:03 I cannot, w/ Hegel assert that absolute knowledge (THE definitive account of 'the whole'--a final reconciliation of all view points)--is, in fact, inevitable; nor even comprehensible. The whole of intelligible reality cannot be made transparent to thought. CERTAINLY there are various realities which exist in/as a web of intelligible relationships which we can (feel compelled to, even) explore together dialectically. There is enough commonality for? human solidarity w/o resorting to total unity. "The ideal of ... By: 0ThouArtThat0. on 22 Jan 10, 08:34:49 "The ideal of objective thought is both based upon and? ruined by temporality." Hegel seems to me to do a good job preserving knowledge even in undeniably historical contexts. If knowledge is conceived of as a substance, never having to go out of and return to itself, then of course the inclusion of concrete time destroys its very foundation. But if thought can unite with being in becoming, true knowledge is possible. Being conceived of independently of thought is a mere abstraction anyways. Photo Walkthrough of Maurice Merleau Ponty's Existentialism Posted by: talktolrw Video duration: 257 seconds Global video hits: 666 A walkthrough of Maurice Merleau Ponty's Existentialist views via photographic exploration and explanation. I claim no rights to this music, it is Black & Gold by Sam Sparro. Related: photo, walkthrough, of, maurice, merleau, pontys, existentialism Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: Interesting! You ... By: talktolrw. on 15 Sep 11, 08:08:27 Interesting! You bring up some very good points. This was actually a project I did when I was a senior in high school during? my one week intro to existentialism and Merleau-Ponty. We were asked to do a photo essay outlining the chapter or two we read of his work, so this is the product of that project. Not an in-depth look in any way, but more of a concentrated analysis of the chapters I read. I never took it down after we finished the class, which is why it's still on YouTube. I wanted to? add a ... By: uremove. on 11 Sep 11, 15:34:31 I wanted to? add a 5th, (I ran out of space) - Probably the most important! 5) We cope in the world NOT by making mental representations of things, but through our inter-corporeality. We are OF the world, not just IN it. We understand each other's expressions (through mirror neurons) because your expression is instinctively mirrored by my body. As we become more skilled at using stuff, we become less conscious of how we are doing it - we flow! MP called that "sedimentation". Great visuals & ... By: uremove. on 11 Sep 11, 14:53:46 Great visuals & music! However, I wouldn't sum up Merleau-Ponty in those 4 points..? Maybe? something more like: 1) Our perception has neither subject nor object - these arise by reflection. 2) Through our coping, our directedness is towards gaining "maximum grip" of our perceptual world, which simultaneously summons our attention. 3) Our body, or "flesh" is the chiasm between touching (empiricism) and being touched (phenomenology). 4) Perception comes to us a whole gestalt, not in bits. OK? The Last Dream of Maurice Merleau Ponty (Featuring Music by Damian Coldwell) Posted by: damiancoldwell Video duration: 675 seconds Global video hits: 344 1996 First Cut broadcast of the Yum Loo film based on the theatre show of the same name Related: yum, loo, sci-fi, philosophy, future, technology, damian, coldwell, simon, will, danny, jeiphes, jess, williams, penn, linfield, james, farncombe, adam, king, chris, davis Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: wtf is this??? By: mrpornghost. on 03 May 11, 13:32:27 wtf is this??? Hommage à Henri Bergson (1/13)- Gaston Berger (p.1) Posted by: Katamanteuomos Video duration: 469 seconds Global video hits: 2119 Hommage à Henri Bergson (19.V.1959, la Sorbonne) La conférence menée par Gaston Berger. Avec la participation de Gabriel Marcel Maurice Merleau-Ponty Jean Wahl Vladimir Jankélévitch Related: hommage, henri, bergson, gabriel, marcel, maurice, merleau-ponty, jean, wahl, vladimir, jankélévitch, gaston, berger Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: Bon jour! Could ... By: FredeGF. on 18 Nov 11, 14:04:53 Bon jour! Could this be translated? Just in subtitles. It would be much appreciated! Especially the part with Merleau-Ponty.? Perhaps you could convince Eidos84 to do it? Merci! Merci.? By: MrFeejee. on 26 Jul 11, 20:13:38 Merci.? Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17   How to meet women Related Videos How To Meet Women On Facebook - How To Meet Women Online - How To Meet Exotic Foreign Women - How Do Widowers Meet Women - How To Meet Local Single Women - How Do Women Meet Men - How To Meet Women Off Facebook You like it? Share it! Social Bookmarking

How to meet women videos :: Videos are copyright their respective owners :: Feedback powered by: Customer Feedback