 |
President Jimmy Carter - "Crisis of Confidence" Speech
Posted by: MCamericanpresident
Video duration: 317 seconds
Global video hits: 168100
View the full speech here: millercenter.org President Carter speaks to Americans about the "crisis of confidence" in American government, values, and way of life, as the public expresses doubt in a better future for their own children. Carter challenges citizens to unite and address the problems in America by first addressing the energy shortage. July 15th, 1979
Related: american, president, jimmy, carter, crisis, of, confidence, malaise
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
|
|
 |
Jimmy Carter: Crisis of Confidence
Posted by: 235pics
Video duration: 1072 seconds
Global video hits: 100237
View the full speech here: millercenter.org President Carter speaks to Americans about the "crisis of confidence" in American government, values, and way of life, as the public expresses doubt in a better future for their own children. Carter challenges citizens to unite and address the problems in America by first addressing the energy shortage. July 15th, 1979
Related: american, president, jimmy, carter, crisis, of, confidence, malaise, inspirational, speeches, energy, capitalism, socialism, solar, power, oil
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
|
|
 |
Malaise - Strawhouses Live
Posted by: paulstraws1
Video duration: 310 seconds
Global video hits: 1676
Strawhouses play Malaise Recorded live at the Zanzibar by Andy the Soundman & Jon "Legend" Withnall Mixed and Mastered at JWS by Jon "Legend" Withnall Filmed and Edited by Ged Doyle (Plast-c) & Laura Pearson (Vinyl) (ably assisted by Alex Girl on camera)
Related: strawhouses, malaise, straw, houses, paul, donnelly, michael, bradshaw, stuart, mann, chris, smith
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
|
|
 |
Otrivin Nasal Spray
Posted by: liviumarica
Video duration: 31 seconds
Global video hits: 18592
liviumarica.ro Otrivin Nasal Spray commercial Classroom Craft Advertising Agency: Saatchi & Saatchi
Related: advertising, agency, saatchi, commercial, spot, ads, commercials, otrivin, nasal, spray, tv, classroom, craft, cannes, lions, 2011
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
|
|
 |
BMW e30 318is drifting a roundabout. Oversteer Malaise
Posted by: Malaise318is
Video duration: 544 seconds
Global video hits: 19196
Malaise drifting his BMW e30 318is around a roundabout in pooring rain.
Related: malaise, bmw, e30, 318is, awforum, autowereld, drifting, oversteer, rain, tires, smoke, top, gear, fifth, cars, action
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
|
|
|
|
How to meet women Related VideosYou like it? Share it!
Social Bookmarking 
|
Latest comments made on this video:
By: thecocoabeans1. on 26 May 12, 17:16:18
this coming from a republican, jimmy carter? wasn't a bad president, he was just president in a bad time. if ford had been re elected in 76, carter could have won in 1980 and he would have had the reagan economic recovery with his great dedication to worker's rights, social welfare, and the environment. If he had been elected in 80 instead of 76, he probably would be considered one of the greatest presidents the USA has ever had.
By: thelurker25. on 24 May 12, 23:22:24
"there? you go again" - Ronald Reagan
By: abcdefghujklmnopqrus. on 24 May 12, 18:23:35
You clearly have no idea what you're talking about. Any further discussion about this would be lost on you. You're just mad that i'm right so you result to insults. Your kind aren't welcome on this planet, or anywhere else in the universe.?
By: theteachingchannel. on 24 May 12, 15:54:06
Too bad we didn't listen--a Solar Bank--and the path of less consumption--we'd have a lot less coalition soldiers, civilians, Iraqis, Afghanis, and others? dead right now. :( If all of us even refused to drive one day a month since that speech--(knowing it is not always possible)--but what a savings we could have achieved by starting new lifestyle habits way back when...
By: thelurker25. on 23 May 12, 05:41:32
no, you aren't right. millions of people agree with me - especially back in 1980 when Jimmeh was POTUS. The energy crisis, iran hostage crisis, and the increasing unemployment happened on HIS watch. These are few of the reasons why there was a crisis? of confidence on Jimmeh. The American people knew better than to suffer four more years of bullshit and so they voted that jackass out of office. your so fucking stupid and you've shown nothing to support your argument. please fuck off and die.
By: abcdefghujklmnopqrus. on 23 May 12, 05:23:14
See kid, insulting is what those who run out of things to say do. It's a sign of weakness. You know i'm right, i don't give a damn if you don't believe me. I know i'm right and you're just showing everyone who stupid you are by denying what i say as? fact. Go get a life, better yet a job and make something of yourself.
By: thelurker25. on 22 May 12, 22:58:37
idiot, you are the troll. you are the one claiming jimmeh was a great man, when all he did was fuck the american people over. why don't? you burn in hell, you stupid piece of shit?
By: abcdefghujklmnopqrus. on 22 May 12, 22:56:15
Your trolling needs improvement jackass but hey, I don't expect you to actually do that. I just expect you to froth at the mouth, denying reality? while the rest of humanity moves on.
By: thelurker25. on 21 May 12, 14:22:19
you like carter because he fucked the american people.? you are probably some stupid european who likes jimmeh and obama. jimmeh lost his re-election. reagan ftw - in fact, reagan won not once, but twice! fuck off you dipshit. loser
By: abcdefghujklmnopqrus. on 21 May 12, 06:18:40
wow.. you're classy. I? don't like Reagan because i don't think he really knew what he was doing. I like Jimmy Carter because he actually seems to just be 1 of us. He's humble. Now then... tell me to go fuck someone. That's obviously the only thing you can do, halfwit.
By: thelurker25. on 20 May 12, 06:21:57
better idea - fuck? your mom and carter
By: BloodMoneyLLC. on 19 May 12, 17:24:21
Reaganomics didn't work. You can cherry-pick the hell? out of all the data you want, but you still won't be able to say the facts are on your side. Sacrificing the social safety-net, worker's rights, & civil liberties for superficial short-term gains in economic growth has long-term detrimental consequences -- like we saw in the 2008 economic crisis & continue to see today. "Great leaders" don't destroy economies. There is serious speculation that Reagan was of unsound mind while still in office.
By: FuckPropertyRights. on 19 May 12, 17:18:40
fuck reagan?
By: unclepic1. on 19 May 12, 17:17:51
Reaganomics was not the greatest thing to ever happen my only point is it worked and in the end its really an opinion question, and if anything the facts are on my side. The only reason I cared to respond to the first comment is because it was such a disrespectful thing to say about one of America's great leaders. Its not funny that you reference the alzheimer's which greatly troubled him in his later years. Its a tragic thing when some fucker? over the internet makes fun of something so awful.
By: BloodMoneyLLC. on 19 May 12, 17:05:53
You do of course realize that there's a significant lag time between drilling for oil & lower prices, right? All research indicates that, even if you drilled all of America's oil? resources, you wouldn't see much of a decrease at the pump. This energy policy is neither supply or demand side. It is simply strategic management of national resources. If you focus on a narrow range of factors, Reaganomics looks successful over the past 30+ years. Scratch beneath the surface & it gets ugly pretty fast
By: unclepic1. on 19 May 12, 16:49:07
THE ENERGY CRISIS WAS BECAUSE DEMAND SIDE ECONOMICS! The whole reason it happened was because OPEC put an embargo on the US making it hard to get oil and Carter was to wimpy to drill. The demand was insane and the price of oil was skyrocketing. Rationing was the only way to stop an almost hyper inflation to occur where our currency is worthless in the real world. Oh and if you can not contribute Reagan's economic policies to 80s success? then contribute it to the 90s which were also great.
By: BloodMoneyLLC. on 19 May 12, 14:19:15
I ignored nothing about Reagan. There's simply no reason attribute low inflation & low unemployment directly to Reagan's economic policies. To the contrary? of what you said, the 1973-1975 recession was caused by the end of the Bretton Woods system of regulations on international finance (meaning the END of Demand Side implementation), an oil crisis, & the emergence of newly industrialized nations. All of those major factors were OUTSIDE the hands of the American President.THINK before you assume
By: unclepic1. on 19 May 12, 12:55:44
Demand side economics is the reason economically the 70s sucked my friend. Yes it is factual that Carter got the deal done but to say the fact that Reagan coming into office had nothing to do with it is nonsensical. You continue to? ignore the fact that the Reagan administration brought down inflation, unemployment, and had the largest period of economic growth in history. Now I'm sorry but its hard to debate such ignorance
By: BloodMoneyLLC. on 19 May 12, 00:17:34
It's just factually incorrect to say that, had Reagan lost, the Iranians wouldn't have released them. Carter negotiated the whole deal for a long time. Calling me or other people names doesn't lend your argument any credence. You're missing out on losses in real income? & disposable income initiated by Reagan. We haven't been ABLE to practice Demand-Side economics since the early 1970s. The problem with supply-side is that we've had it for 30+ years & the law of diminishing returns is in effect.
By: unclepic1. on 18 May 12, 22:34:57
They would not have released them if Carter was reelected do you really think it is merely a coincidence that they were released the day before he was elected? I am pretty sure Carter would have gotten them out? before the election if he could have dumbass. And aside from "neoliberalism" which is used by American conservatives where was I wrong? Please disprove anything I said in the prior comment. Its demand side economics which create awful inflationary rates which hurt the consumer greatly.
By: BloodMoneyLLC. on 18 May 12, 22:06:57
Your interpretation of political history is superficial at best & cynically dishonest at its worst. Your understanding of basic academic definitions of schools of economics also appears to be lacking. "Neoliberalism" is the name academics give to "supply side economics," which is is slightly? ironic because American conservative politicians are most predisposed toward embracing it. Nonetheless, Supply Side is destructive in the long term & Carter had already negotiated the release before Reagan.
By: unclepic1. on 18 May 12, 13:22:03
Actually supply side economics is? a conservative view, basically used to decrease inflation which he had to do in order to fix the mess Carter created. Unemployment was below 5% for the majority of his term and 17 million jobs were created and if your referring to the Iran hostage crisis they released them the day Reagan became president because they one hated Jimmy Carter and two were afraid Reagan would be willing to take military action you idiot. Carter gets blamed correctly every time.
By: BloodMoneyLLC. on 17 May 12, 19:01:52
I do know my history already. A lot of the things that Carter gets blamed for? were largely outside of his own control. His defeat by Reagan was predicated almost entirely on blaming Carter for things that weren't necessarily his fault. Your "national humiliation" talking point fails to consider the eventual successful outcome of the Iran crisis. This nothing to do with Maddow. It has to do with the folly of Reagan's neoliberal Supply-Side economics that we've pursued for over 30 years now.
By: unclepic1. on 17 May 12, 18:58:52
Certainly he was no enemy of the rich and I am sure like most responsible modern Presidents he was in close communications with some of the heads of the largest banks in the world. I mean? its not like President Obama has been highly funded by Goldman Sachs or anything.
By: adamc2208. on 17 May 12, 15:56:42
he is trying to make a point about how your system was being perverted by the powerful! All systems to an extent are, but the american system has proved to be extremely susceptible. Rather than try to work toward needed changes not to your values but to PREVENT THIS HAPPENING, you acted typically american and overeacted. Hence electing Reagan. I am Australian and we have 2? retards to choose between for Prime Minister, but at least they are powerless retards, the power lies wih the voting public.