 |
Harald Schmidt - Heidegger Sketch
Posted by: abtnihil
Video duration: 78 seconds
Global video hits: 52172
German TV satirist Harald Schmidt in a sketch incorporating writings by German philosopher Martin Heidegger.
Related: martin, heidegger, harald, schmidt, schmidteinander, herbert, feuerstein, philosophie, philosophy, german, sketch, tv, cult, classic
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
|
|
 |
Heidegger, part 1
Posted by: apolloxias
Video duration: 656 seconds
Global video hits: 9651
Entitled Opinions Robert Harrison talks with Andrew Mitchell about Martin Heidegger. www.stanford.edu
Related: entitled, opinions, martin, heidegger, robert, harrison, andrew, mitchell, philosophy, being, and, time, metaphysics, ontology, existentialism, authenticity, technology, dasein, phenomenology
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
|
|
|
|
How to meet women Related VideosYou like it? Share it!
Social Bookmarking 
|
Latest comments made on this video:
By: OC8O. on 24 May 12, 14:36:51
What a shallow? examination of a brilliant philosopher.
By: IStehSHIT. on 10 May 12, 15:40:26
This is? just USA propaganda
By: zarakhast. on 26 Apr 12, 16:15:04
To THINK is to venture into the unknown. Science never really ventures into the unknown. The unknown and unknowable? is the Nothing - but this can be experienced. All the great religions know this and have always known this.
By: TheZurul. on 16 Apr 12, 23:10:57
sarcasm doesn't translate well through youtube comments I'm afraid. P.S. This documentary has little to say about Heidegger's philosophy and is more interested in his? salacious political leanings.
By: TheDavid2222. on 16 Apr 12, 05:23:20
okay??
By: TheZurul. on 14 Apr 12, 01:53:56
sometimes? "thinking" is offensive
By: hd2398cn. on 13 Apr 12, 23:36:43
the only reason people hate nazis is a) school and b)? creepy music in documentaries
By: hd2398cn. on 13 Apr 12, 23:36:15
National Socialists are badass, I don't give one flying fucking SHIT if this guy? was one.
By: DaseinFly. on 29 Feb 12, 02:01:52
I very much enjoy reading Heidegger, but I found commentaries? on Heidegger from Adorno's perspective to be quite compelling. See "Sartre and Adorno: The dialectics of subjectivity" by Sherman
By: TheDavid2222. on 23 Jan 12, 18:37:27
Potentially Offensive?! FUCK YOU YouTube!!!!!!? This world we've made for ourselves is incredibly pathetic the vast majority of the time.
By: craigpsimpson. on 13 Jan 12, 13:25:43
Why has this been? flagged as potentially offensive?
By: Egleemann. on 26 Dec 11, 03:11:49
què gracia, se llama Elfriede como mi hija.... y una grabacion de super 8mm. me encantan verlas,? tan anatiguas,,tienen un algo especial...
By: ThePhilosorpheus. on 13 Nov 11, 15:26:37
I agree, yet I think nothingness is a question which a community can unanimously decide. Each one of us understands the question differently and it has a particular value for each one of us, but in answering that question to ourselves what is the deciding factor? Reason? A leap of faith? Intuition? - if it is reason, there is a normative sense to that answer, for it implies logic, therefore a common "decision". Plus, I don´t believe a coherent society is possible without this decision?
By: zarakhast. on 04 Nov 11, 17:47:45
Ask a modern scientist a genuinely metaphysical question and he will immediately try to turn it into a scientific problem. Heidegger's essay, What Is Metaphysics ?, properly understood, debunks the arrogance of modern science. Do these modern? monkeys actually believe that they have "overcome" philosophy ? They depend on its teachings even now.
By: zarakhast. on 04 Nov 11, 17:43:08
... even arriving at questions which are actually of any importance. Institutions such as universities are a positive hindrance. They pay lip-service to "free-thinking" but they? are in truth groups of cowards and dunderheads who lack any individuality or originality. Modern science is the "religion of commonsense". It loves to obscure the true questions by presenting its own pseudo-questions and assuming an air of authority which it does not really possess.
By: zarakhast. on 04 Nov 11, 17:35:34
This is exactly why Heidegger's question concerning Nothing is so important now. It is not a question which a community can unanimously decide, unless each member of that community goes away and asks that question by himself, to himself. But it is unlikely in the extreme that this will happen, so I'm afraid we're stuck with scientists and their stupid questions and answers. You truly need to be an independently-minded? type to have any hope of ....
By: ThePhilosorpheus. on 23 Oct 11, 17:33:11
Indeed. They all reduce the functioning of the world to their own perspective. Just the other day I saw a video about one of Google´s top software programmer, who also worked at NASA, talking about quantum mechanics. His conclusion was basically that our perception of reality is probably false (the old philosophical problem of realism/idealism) and why?.. Because? in his perspective we´re very much like softwares programmed to perceive the world the way we do. Ridiculous.
By: zarakhast. on 20 Oct 11, 04:05:42
How do people watch documentaries like these ? The BBC is a legendary institution. Documentaries which seek to "sell" a particular point of view are pretty pathetic and will never stand stand the test of? time. The BBC has always been almost revered worldwide precisely because it has always veered away from this tendency. But is this an impartial portrait of Heidegger ? I don't think so. And where in the documentary is there any discussion of his thought ?
By: zarakhast. on 20 Oct 11, 01:53:28
Scientists now have a monopoly on "cleverness". They are the most impressive people alive today. They are not RIGHT of course (they haven't got a clue in fact), but they have all the "best arguments" (even though these these arguments are, in actual fact, shit). They have decided? that they already know what "reality" is and what "being" means. These are not important questions for them : they are not questions at all. And so, arseholes that they are, they rule our world.
By: DrFruedienslip. on 15 Oct 11, 18:47:12
Thank you, Its difficult to imagine just how much anyone truly knows, for instance how ? much can anyone express within words any and all things of any and all experiences, and also questions what has driven any and all past and present philosophers; even the word philosophy is a questionable noun. Seemingly any philosophic exemplification would be related to defining any and all common experiences which is anything metaphysical within which to establish? any mainstay....ect
By: DrFruedienslip. on 15 Oct 11, 18:40:19
Any intent within exemplifying anything Quantum Mechanical would have everything to do within having a mainstay within any regards within exemplifying any and all intelligence' Intelligence itself would then be considered anything absolute and irrefutible within any and all sciences including heatlh concerns, and especially anthing social; example:? Intrinsic Anthropology has been expanding within any and all technologies which demand any sense within any sensewithin anyconstrual.
By: ThePhilosorpheus. on 15 Oct 11, 16:11:32
Very interesting? point!
By: ThePhilosorpheus. on 15 Oct 11, 16:08:41
Couldn´t agree more. Curious how it became impossible to discuss with scientists, curious how discoveries which could have profound implications concerning some of the deepest philosophical issues, concerning fundamental human values, are overlooked, depending on whether or not it serves as means to build a new faster computer. I´m no communist, but that scientist´s arrogance goes hand in hand with the industrialist way of thinking is undeniable. ?
By: b4ssfactory. on 25 Sep 11, 15:15:53
If you think discussions and debates are pointless then what are you doing with? philosophy? :P