Heidegger video compilations

Heidegger life and Philosophy ... Posted by: wtsbqm Video duration: 519 seconds Global video hits: 151653 Heidegger life and Philosophy Related: heidegger, philosophy, existencialism, phenomenologie Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: What a shallow? ... By: OC8O. on 24 May 12, 14:36:51 What a shallow? examination of a brilliant philosopher. This is? just USA ... By: IStehSHIT. on 10 May 12, 15:40:26 This is? just USA propaganda To THINK is to ... By: zarakhast. on 26 Apr 12, 16:15:04 To THINK is to venture into the unknown. Science never really ventures into the unknown. The unknown and unknowable? is the Nothing - but this can be experienced. All the great religions know this and have always known this. sarcasm doesn't ... By: TheZurul. on 16 Apr 12, 23:10:57 sarcasm doesn't translate well through youtube comments I'm afraid. P.S. This documentary has little to say about Heidegger's philosophy and is more interested in his? salacious political leanings. okay?? By: TheDavid2222. on 16 Apr 12, 05:23:20 okay?? sometimes? " ... By: TheZurul. on 14 Apr 12, 01:53:56 sometimes? "thinking" is offensive the only reason ... By: hd2398cn. on 13 Apr 12, 23:36:43 the only reason people hate nazis is a) school and b)? creepy music in documentaries National Socialists ... By: hd2398cn. on 13 Apr 12, 23:36:15 National Socialists are badass, I don't give one flying fucking SHIT if this guy? was one. I very much enjoy ... By: DaseinFly. on 29 Feb 12, 02:01:52 I very much enjoy reading Heidegger, but I found commentaries? on Heidegger from Adorno's perspective to be quite compelling. See "Sartre and Adorno: The dialectics of subjectivity" by Sherman Potentially ... By: TheDavid2222. on 23 Jan 12, 18:37:27 Potentially Offensive?! FUCK YOU YouTube!!!!!!? This world we've made for ourselves is incredibly pathetic the vast majority of the time. Why has this been? ... By: craigpsimpson. on 13 Jan 12, 13:25:43 Why has this been? flagged as potentially offensive? què gracia, se ... By: Egleemann. on 26 Dec 11, 03:11:49 què gracia, se llama Elfriede como mi hija.... y una grabacion de super 8mm. me encantan verlas,? tan anatiguas,,tienen un algo especial... I agree, yet I ... By: ThePhilosorpheus. on 13 Nov 11, 15:26:37 I agree, yet I think nothingness is a question which a community can unanimously decide. Each one of us understands the question differently and it has a particular value for each one of us, but in answering that question to ourselves what is the deciding factor? Reason? A leap of faith? Intuition? - if it is reason, there is a normative sense to that answer, for it implies logic, therefore a common "decision". Plus, I don´t believe a coherent society is possible without this decision? Ask a modern ... By: zarakhast. on 04 Nov 11, 17:47:45 Ask a modern scientist a genuinely metaphysical question and he will immediately try to turn it into a scientific problem. Heidegger's essay, What Is Metaphysics ?, properly understood, debunks the arrogance of modern science. Do these modern? monkeys actually believe that they have "overcome" philosophy ? They depend on its teachings even now. ... even arriving ... By: zarakhast. on 04 Nov 11, 17:43:08 ... even arriving at questions which are actually of any importance. Institutions such as universities are a positive hindrance. They pay lip-service to "free-thinking" but they? are in truth groups of cowards and dunderheads who lack any individuality or originality. Modern science is the "religion of commonsense". It loves to obscure the true questions by presenting its own pseudo-questions and assuming an air of authority which it does not really possess. This is exactly why ... By: zarakhast. on 04 Nov 11, 17:35:34 This is exactly why Heidegger's question concerning Nothing is so important now. It is not a question which a community can unanimously decide, unless each member of that community goes away and asks that question by himself, to himself. But it is unlikely in the extreme that this will happen, so I'm afraid we're stuck with scientists and their stupid questions and answers. You truly need to be an independently-minded? type to have any hope of .... Indeed. They all ... By: ThePhilosorpheus. on 23 Oct 11, 17:33:11 Indeed. They all reduce the functioning of the world to their own perspective. Just the other day I saw a video about one of Google´s top software programmer, who also worked at NASA, talking about quantum mechanics. His conclusion was basically that our perception of reality is probably false (the old philosophical problem of realism/idealism) and why?.. Because? in his perspective we´re very much like softwares programmed to perceive the world the way we do. Ridiculous. How do people watch ... By: zarakhast. on 20 Oct 11, 04:05:42 How do people watch documentaries like these ? The BBC is a legendary institution. Documentaries which seek to "sell" a particular point of view are pretty pathetic and will never stand stand the test of? time. The BBC has always been almost revered worldwide precisely because it has always veered away from this tendency. But is this an impartial portrait of Heidegger ? I don't think so. And where in the documentary is there any discussion of his thought ? Scientists now have ... By: zarakhast. on 20 Oct 11, 01:53:28 Scientists now have a monopoly on "cleverness". They are the most impressive people alive today. They are not RIGHT of course (they haven't got a clue in fact), but they have all the "best arguments" (even though these these arguments are, in actual fact, shit). They have decided? that they already know what "reality" is and what "being" means. These are not important questions for them : they are not questions at all. And so, arseholes that they are, they rule our world. Thank you, Its ... By: DrFruedienslip. on 15 Oct 11, 18:47:12 Thank you, Its difficult to imagine just how much anyone truly knows, for instance how ? much can anyone express within words any and all things of any and all experiences, and also questions what has driven any and all past and present philosophers; even the word philosophy is a questionable noun. Seemingly any philosophic exemplification would be related to defining any and all common experiences which is anything metaphysical within which to establish? any mainstay....ect Any intent within ... By: DrFruedienslip. on 15 Oct 11, 18:40:19 Any intent within exemplifying anything Quantum Mechanical would have everything to do within having a mainstay within any regards within exemplifying any and all intelligence' Intelligence itself would then be considered anything absolute and irrefutible within any and all sciences including heatlh concerns, and especially anthing social; example:? Intrinsic Anthropology has been expanding within any and all technologies which demand any sense within any sensewithin anyconstrual. Very interesting? ... By: ThePhilosorpheus. on 15 Oct 11, 16:11:32 Very interesting? point! Couldn´t agree more ... By: ThePhilosorpheus. on 15 Oct 11, 16:08:41 Couldn´t agree more. Curious how it became impossible to discuss with scientists, curious how discoveries which could have profound implications concerning some of the deepest philosophical issues, concerning fundamental human values, are overlooked, depending on whether or not it serves as means to build a new faster computer. I´m no communist, but that scientist´s arrogance goes hand in hand with the industrialist way of thinking is undeniable. ? If you think ... By: b4ssfactory. on 25 Sep 11, 15:15:53 If you think discussions and debates are pointless then what are you doing with? philosophy? :P 1/5 Heidegger and the Rejection of Humanism Posted by: chrisltft Video duration: 532 seconds Global video hits: 9940 Transcript: rickroderick.org Part of the second lecture in the "Self Under Siege" series. Presented by Dr Rick Roderick for The Teaching Company in 1993. Direct downloads, mp3's at wimpywombat.net Related: rick roderick, life Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: I had the chance to ... By: Debordsbullet. on 17 Feb 12, 03:39:45 I had the chance to work on my graduate work under Roderick in Texas in the 90s and I passed the chance up to go else where and to this day I regret that decision.? What an amazing intellect. I love this guy so ... By: Firebiird. on 07 Jan 12, 02:05:43 I love this guy so much. Wish I? could have met him. heidegger on future of philosophy (english subtitles) Posted by: sudyma Video duration: 129 seconds Global video hits: 35256 heidegger (translated by me, processed and integrated into video by ludwig schubert ) sorry for the mistakes...did not make a review...haha Related: heidegger, philosophy Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: heidegger? said ... By: Ryanyarb24. on 02 Apr 12, 02:53:27 heidegger? said that newtons classical mechanics became true when he (Newton) said it was true. ...) Secondly the ... By: roryscanlon. on 03 Feb 12, 21:59:49 ...) Secondly the mind "going beyond itself" is Impossible and absurd. We cannot go beyond ourselves, for? as soon as we did, we would cease to be ourselves. The only mind that goes beyond itself is that of the insane. But we can have insight into reality through the body and mind. We can know ourselves to a degree. And someone else, from the beyond, can carry us into the beyond with him. But if there's noone there, there's no way to get there. As for the whole ... By: roryscanlon. on 03 Feb 12, 21:57:41 As for the whole going beyond, like Nietzsche's overcoming... I just don't buy it (anymore--I? used to!). In the first place, we can't go beyond the body to the mind--because we are embodied rational animals (humans) and not angels! If we were angels, how much more intelligent our arguments would be! Well 2.75 (note)) ... By: roryscanlon. on 03 Feb 12, 21:53:46 Well 2.75 (note)) *** Youtube? messed with my spacing between lines! 2.75) To be as ... By: roryscanlon. on 03 Feb 12, 21:52:40 2.75) To be as blunt as possible: in Modern Science ontology (study of being) is made subservient to epistemology (how we know) things only exist for us to know them in Metaphysics epistemology services ontology we? study how we know things, in order to know being, which we do not already know. These two are quite distinct, quite contradictory in spirit. I've heard no reasonable argument for the conflation of the two with each other. 2.5) Metaphysics ... By: roryscanlon. on 03 Feb 12, 21:47:39 2.5) Metaphysics is certainly not the same as modern physics and modern philosophy, which treats nature as a series of abstract, calculable quantities, and abstract, arbitrary forces. It is modern science which conceived all the world? as mere "mental reality" (in the head), and then proceeded to take that mind out of everything---not western metaphysics--certainly not the Good of the Ancients or the Christian God. Well... 2)? ... By: roryscanlon. on 03 Feb 12, 21:42:15 Well... 2)? Metaphysics is, yes, what goes beyond the natural world--but only in the sense of an underlying order. Metaphysics is that which makes physical realities what they are; so as beyond the physical, it is also inextricably tied to the physical. Metaphysics is insight into the laws of nature. Well... 1) The ... By: roryscanlon. on 03 Feb 12, 21:37:45 Well... 1) The conclusion that the ultimate reality does not exist does not need to be pondered as strange thoughtlessness, but, I would say, to be rejected as false. The ultimate reality does exist. Eternal reality is not an oxymoron, but the eternal? is real. The passing is also real (but less so). It is passing ... By: zarakhast. on 25 Jan 12, 23:58:32 It is passing strange that some people believe that "meta-physics" is merely a "going beyond" the "physical" to the "mental" rather than a going beyond BOTH to what is truly metaphysical, i.e. Nothing. What a set of total chumps today's philosophy students? seem to be ! What the hell happened to wonder's being the "Mother of Philosophy" ? Has NO-ONE read Heidegger properly ? Or just no-one on YouTube (that wouldn't be very surprising). Once again : what ... By: zarakhast. on 25 Jan 12, 23:01:20 Once again : what is the difference between science (physics) and philosophy (meta-physics) ? What is a proper understanding of physis ? Is it the "physical" as opposed to the "mental" ? Or? is the "physical" already supposed to INCLUDE the mental so that "meta-physical" immediately takes on a completely different meaning ? The "meta-" does not go beyond merely to "the mind" - that is a complete insult to metaphysics - it also goes BEYOND THE MIND. Yes, the mind needs to go beyond even ITSELF ! Philosophy needs to ... By: zarakhast. on 22 Jan 12, 02:24:52 Philosophy needs to distinguish itself from "science" again. How the hell did philosophy become the slave of science when science is 100% philosophy when you analyze it ? What has happened ? Why? is every little "scientific" pr*ck of more importance in the minds of not only the public but also of Academe than the philosopher ? What is happening ? "Science" is hocus ... By: zarakhast. on 22 Jan 12, 02:18:13 "Science" is hocus pocus. Every day we read, via the newspapers, internet etc., that some new discovery has been made. But all science is is the? (incredibly big-headed) application of an extremely dubious metaphysical theory which is no longer questioned by anyone because all the thinkers have either fallen asleep or chickened out of the fight. "Science" is, from a philosophical point of view, a joke. It complains about the state of the world and yet it has CAUSED it ! I'm a fan of ... By: roryscanlon. on 14 Jan 12, 19:45:14 I'm a fan of Dostoyevsky too, especially the Idiot. Although no fan of the anti-christ. He throws out the baby? with the bath water. The portrait of ... By: zarakhast. on 14 Jan 12, 19:08:44 The portrait of Christ is in Twlight of the Idols but I can't locate it at the moment. It's certainly there though : I wouldn't make such a claim up. As for Dostoyevsky, the portrait? of Christ in The Idiot is a masterpiece. All of his works are masterpieces. Heidegger regarded him as one of the two "masters of spirit" of the 19th century. Heidegger does not confound Plato's philosophy with science but he sees the seeds of what later became science in Plato's idealism ) Sure Heidegger a ... By: roryscanlon. on 14 Jan 12, 17:28:00 ) Sure Heidegger a la Nietzsche confounds modern science (say Descartes, Francis Bacon) with Platonism, and with Christianity. But they both do so by mere suggestion and assertion. In fact there's no reason to believe that they are of the same ilk. Transcendence, again, is the demonstrative difference. ..... I would like to read the portrait of Christ if you know? where it is. I think this would work with Dostoyevski's the Idiot. 3) In this way the ... By: roryscanlon. on 14 Jan 12, 17:21:39 3) In this way the Sun is like Being itself. but the Sun is also a being, as an image is an image, a thought is a thought, and Being itself is. It Transcends us. For we are finite.? It is infinite and eternal. So of course we do not yet understand "is", we never will. It is greater than our mere understanding... and our understanding must submit before he who is. 2) Plato gives us ... By: roryscanlon. on 14 Jan 12, 17:18:26 2) Plato gives us just such a Being=the being. It is the Good. We see this clearly in the metaphor of the Sun. The sun gives everything its light, its reality (to the intellect) and also its life. It is the way everything? follows: the whole planet revolve around it, the plants live off it; animals see from it; and we see (even intellectually) from it. It cannot be seen because of its own sheer reality; it is too bright. @zarakhast) Nowhere ... By: roryscanlon. on 14 Jan 12, 17:16:16 @zarakhast) Nowhere does Plato say that Being cannot be a being. (as far as I know). If it could not be a being, Being would not be identifiable at all. Nothing could be said of it, positively or negatively. It would "be" unthinkable (the direction of "post" modern). Better to say that Being? is all beings, all possible beings, all possible states of being: becoming, and more than this yet. Being is the transcendent being. it includes and eliminates all distinctions and times 3b) The truth ... By: roryscanlon. on 14 Jan 12, 17:01:40 3b) The truth wells up from within? us. 4)? This difference ... By: roryscanlon. on 14 Jan 12, 16:59:40 4)? This difference is all the difference in the world, between a paradoxical excess or given-ness of reality and a contradictory violence of the unknowable ground. We disagree. 3) More generally: ... By: roryscanlon. on 14 Jan 12, 16:58:22 3) More generally: If something is superior (Being) it encompasses the inferior thing (logic). If it must destroy the inferior to assert itself it is not really superior (in reality) at all. The ground of reason both encompasses and challenges reason, give it its life and provides its ultimate angle of inquiry. The ground of reason only ever seems to contradict reason as it is more reasonable? than what we think: i.e. paradoxically. 2) We have to see ... By: roryscanlon. on 14 Jan 12, 16:54:49 2) We have to see the play of? any reality with the rules of philosophical discourse dialectically. If Being is truly superior to rational logic (and I agree) than it will Not be simply opposed (contradictory) to logic. Because if it were simply opposed that would signal mere reaction: Nietzsche's Ressentiment--or pure irrationalism. This statement: ( ... By: roryscanlon. on 14 Jan 12, 16:52:47 This statement: (this ambiguity...) is wrong. Logic is not a closed system and never has been; if the absolute as ground of logic is greater than any merely logical statement that does not mean that it has to appear? as contradiction. There's no need to be irrational in order to find the source of reason. The source of reason may be paradoxical (overwhelming logic) or tautological (escaping the play of words) but it certainly will not be self-contradictory. ... > Yes, I'm just ... By: roryscanlon. on 14 Jan 12, 16:50:11 Yes, I'm just repeating the same points to,? but attempting to reach understanding anyway... For me, its somewhat useful. Re point 3. It is ... By: zarakhast. on 14 Jan 12, 08:30:49 Re point 3. It is clear that if Being (fixity) and Becoming (flux, change) are? "the same" then this "same" must be that which we ought to be thinking about. Is this "same" a "contradiction" ? If it is then ought we to turn our noses up at it ? How arrogant and stupid is "logic" that it can imagine that is possesses the power or the wherewithal to "judge" the Absolute ? The Meaning of Ontology (Heidegger & Sartre) Posted by: Professoranton Video duration: 537 seconds Global video hits: 5999 READ: www.amazon.com see www.youtube.com www.youtube.com www.youtube.com www.youtube.com & I thank Electronic Phone for the following link webcast.berkeley.edu Related: ontology, phenomenology, existentialism, philosophy, humanity, animality, existence, dasein, being-for-itself Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: ...cease to? exist. By: fallenLionBoy. on 14 May 12, 17:55:40 ...cease to? exist. Consciousness is ... By: fallenLionBoy. on 14 May 12, 17:53:42 Consciousness is the space of our experience. The objects that? we hold in that space (e.g. dreams, thoughts, sounds, pictures, etc.) do change but I, the one who observes these phenomena, still remain the same. Only if we become identified with the objects of our consciousness do we think we change. As far as I am concerned, I don't remember ever being unconscious, so I can't answer your first question. But I do know that in the absence of consciousness, all the objects of our consciousness... If you cease to be ... By: riven688. on 14 May 12, 17:40:41 If you cease to be conscious, then do you still exist? If your consciousness? changes (i.e. in a dream, or through hallucination), are you someone different? I'm conscious, ... By: fallenLionBoy. on 13 May 12, 09:49:32 I'm conscious, therefore I am. This is the most basic and most? important fact of our experience. Human beings begin ... By: Israe5l. on 29 Feb 12, 23:27:30 Human beings begin with language. Then there is the fact of genetics. Language? is in there in humans. And when they express themselves they encounter genetics. Animals have only simple inclinations(non-self-referencial) to express. So they encounter simple genetic anatomy. For humans self-referenciality was there before expressed in outward language. our whole beimg is ... By: Ryanyarb24. on 24 Feb 12, 10:07:51 our whole beimg is entirely based? upon the suns lifecycle, we are comtigent beings this pattern occurs ... By: Ryanyarb24. on 24 Feb 12, 10:05:05 this pattern occurs over and over again throughout the universe, so our whold being, is just? something that will evaporate. imagine how much knowledge and civilizations have been destroyed simply because a main sequence star undergoes its natural processes with the end product being a red giant? all i know is that ... By: Ryanyarb24. on 24 Feb 12, 10:02:37 all i know is that in about 4 billion years the sun a main sequence star will swell into a red giant,? boil away the ocean and melt all living organisms and everytging that was will be nothing. I am certain this pattern has occurred millioms of times before, civilizations rise up with science and art and then everything gets eventually destroyed by the natural process of the star tgeir I'm not? sure about ... By: tyroy57. on 04 Nov 11, 23:16:04 I'm not? sure about this video, do we really have to go back to what is I or what is being. Even Descartes figured that one out. Great stuff ... By: Metalheadtill1die. on 04 Sep 11, 05:27:56 Great stuff professor, Heidegger and Sartre interest me profoundly, Being and Time? is a fantastic read. 2.16 n?sato ... By: parkerjwill. on 04 Apr 11, 10:36:22 2.16 n?sato vidyate bh?vo n?bh?vo vidyate satah? ubhayor api dr?s?t?o? 'ntas tv anayos tattva-dar?ibhih? TRANSLATION Those who are seers of the truth have concluded that of the nonexistent there is no endurance, and of the existent there is no cessation. This seers have concluded by studying the nature of both. (Bhagavad-g?t? As It It 2.16) All the knowledge required to answer these deep questions is completely available in the Sanskrit texts. Check them out at causelessmercy How could you ever ... By: JimmySerpent. on 22 Dec 10, 19:55:57 How could you ever know the meaning of I, when 'meaning' is merely an idea that which? came from 'I'? Sweet vid!? By: jonecruzj3. on 18 Dec 10, 14:31:50 Sweet vid!? Landmark Education ... By: SuperIntuitive1. on 23 Aug 10, 20:02:14 Landmark Education is the best place to learn? about Ontology....Living an affective Life through being! The probablematic: ... By: Israe5l. on 02 Jul 10, 01:29:30 The probablematic: dualism v non-dualism. ? I? guess, we got to ... By: Israe5l. on 30 Jun 10, 02:43:47 I? guess, we got to move on with probablematic concepts. "I" think all this ... By: Israe5l. on 28 Jun 10, 02:26:02 "I" think all this came from Kant. He made phenomenology by making possible intentionality. Hume did not see that, so the investigation into "I" was not possible for Hume. While Kant left the possibility open with synthetic a? priori. Which was the intermingleling of subjective&objective. We know without intentionality (which is a intermingling of subjective&objective) we can not have phenomenology. And the ontological project comes from phenomenology. If humans had ... By: Israe5l. on 23 Jun 10, 23:31:44 If humans had complete control of their language (and will), then he will not suffer. So, animals don't suffer the way we humans do. Animals? suffer of pain. Humans suffer, an ontological suffering. I think humans are ... By: Israe5l. on 23 Jun 10, 02:51:00 I think humans are humans, not because they have language, but because they are capable of psychic suffering (which does involve language). And this is a? negative language. Language not striving for life but opposite. Language that strives for death. Humans do not have control of his own language. your home is brown? By: uberlama. on 23 May 10, 02:29:25 your home is brown? Just a? quick ... By: MuhakgreetsWonhyo. on 02 Nov 09, 10:25:12 Just a? quick thought: there seems to be some debate here between those assigning themselves "analytic" or "continental" labels, which I'm a bit dubious of. More to the point though: do we actually need to have a first-philosophy? But yes, your ... By: directspirit. on 22 Oct 09, 03:31:36 But yes, your original? idea is right. H. purposefully used words to convey many things simultaneously. He also used a lot of neologisms (his hypenations and others). Also, if you haven't seen it, check out "The way to language" in Krell's "Basic Writings." Aloha! I didn't know what? ... By: BrianTheMusicMan. on 22 Oct 09, 02:46:45 I didn't know what? else to call one word having several meanings. You're right in ... By: directspirit. on 22 Oct 09, 02:41:06 You're right in saying "dasein" has multiple meanings & H. doesn't pick words arbitrarily. But, "pun" has a ver specific meaning. It's a noun; it refers not to a word, but to the use of a word. Further, "pun" refers to specifically a humorous use of a word/ The word is purposefully used in such a way as to refer simultaneously to different connotations of the word (or it has to do with using a word? in a particular context where it humorously rhymes with another word. Aloha! Yes, "there-being" ... By: BrianTheMusicMan. on 22 Oct 09, 02:24:09 Yes, "there-being" is one of its meanings. But it is indeed a pun, I'm quite sure. By pun I merely mean that the word doesn't have one single solid meaning, but branches in many different connected directions. Heidegger does not pick words arbitrarily, every word is full of depth? and poetry. Reactions to Heidegger's 'Being and Time' Posted by: hiperf289 Video duration: 395 seconds Global video hits: 36326 Related: N/A Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: Martin Heidegger - 'Im Denken unterwegs' Posted by: hiperf289 Video duration: 149 seconds Global video hits: 40729 Related: N/A Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: can anybody ... By: paul0broom. on 20 Feb 07, 23:05:48 can anybody translate it ???? Martin Heidegger Critiques Karl Marx - 1969 Posted by: hiperf289 Video duration: 93 seconds Global video hits: 268382 Related: N/A Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: In order to ... By: DocteurLariviere. on 04 Mar 08, 16:18:39 In order to understand Heidegger's withdrawal from the visionary political hopes he had in 1933, and the development of his thinking toward a new universal religion (new gods), one must read the essays? by Leo Strauss on this subject, & on Heidegger's radical historicism. These Strauss essays may be found at the "Internet Archive" at archive[dot]org under "Strauss on Heidegger". Strauss & Heidegger express the conflict of our time on the deepest level. GEORGE PATTISON ON HEIDEGGER Posted by: StJohnsNottingham Video duration: 1272 seconds Global video hits: 1837 This is an extract from one of our timeline projects. Please visit our timeline website for more information and to access our online editions of our timelines. www.stjt.org.uk Related: george, pattison, on, heidegger Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: Wonderful and ... By: homologeo. on 23 Mar 12, 14:38:28 Wonderful and insightful. Thank you St John's for putting these up, and thanks George Pattison for the great overview? here. The great thing ... By: tobecoful. on 23 Jan 12, 14:53:24 The great thing about the internet and Youtube in particular is that if your attention span is unable to stretch as far as 20mins before boredom sets in, you can always? click on something else. This must be part ... By: KevinSolway. on 21 Dec 11, 05:51:30 This must be part of? a plan to turn people away from philosophy by boring them to death. Martin Heidegger At His Freiburg House Posted by: hiperf289 Video duration: 64 seconds Global video hits: 18868 Related: N/A Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: William J. Richardson on Heidegger's Being and Time Posted by: BabetteBabich Video duration: 2171 seconds Global video hits: 3296 Bill Richardson on Heidegger's Being and Time with reflections on Errancy and Truth. Babette Babich asks William J. Richardson what, for him personally, stands out about Martin Heidegger's Being and Time. Video: Babette Babich Recorded 7 October 2011, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA Related: being, continental philosophy Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: Wonderful ... By: rhwinner. on 25 May 12, 00:17:23 Wonderful explanation of Being and Time.? I just finished a ... By: JosephTheodoreWeber. on 17 May 12, 01:33:49 I just finished a seminar with Bill, he's as sharp as he? ever was! What a wonderful ... By: echlyn. on 24 Apr 12, 16:57:15 What a wonderful interview. I would've loved to hear his opinion about the older Heidegger's philosophy. Are you planning to do another interview,? or was this just a one-time event? Thank you. This is wonderful. ... By: roisinbradley. on 19 Oct 11, 04:19:56 This is wonderful. Thank you thank? you. Werner Erhard on Heidegger Posted by: wernererhardandest Video duration: 265 seconds Global video hits: 14100 Related: werner erhard, heidegger, philosophy, philosophers Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: Maybe what empowers ... By: rah01kah. on 04 Sep 10, 17:59:03 Maybe what empowers people cannot be used by them, maybe we need a kind of listening that can be present for what is powerful and not useful.......maybe what is useless is that which people empower and cannot be used by anyone, thereby being powerfully present to what is not useful......futhermore the uselessness of what is empowering to people? cannot be the kind of listening that can or cannot be present to anyone...... Man acts as though ... By: lynnromaine. on 02 Sep 10, 13:27:10 Man acts as though he were the shaper and master of language, while in fact language remains the? master of man. Martin Heidegger I am so tired of ... By: dmimcg. on 02 May 10, 04:58:53 I am so tired of the Jews playing the victim card. Over and over and over. Time to move on. Life isn't fair, Hitler sucked, blah blah blah. It's now 2010, not 1944. Lose the victim mode and your life just might? work. tkilshaw. Heidegger ... By: tkilshaw. on 02 May 10, 04:47:39 Heidegger collaborated with the Nazis, handing over Jewish faculty members. Remeber that when you? read his philosophy. How can we get the ... By: RunTMCfan. on 13 Apr 10, 23:46:41 How can we get the whole thing. This is excellent. I am a Landmark Forum graduate. Took the advanced course, the integrity seminar and? taking the Introduction Leader program right. Will be taking the coomunication Access to Power next month and plan on taking all the curriculum for living classes. The more we listen to it the better. Thanks for sharing. Perhaps what is ... By: CloudshadowMan1. on 28 Nov 09, 00:40:01 Perhaps what is most worthy to be with? is that which no one can understand and directly use? its about landmark ... By: pjanyani. on 27 Sep 09, 19:26:49 its about landmark forum. attend it in ur city? if u havent yet. the most profound experience Martin H. was a man ... By: golfer6716. on 27 Aug 09, 06:37:19 Martin H. was a man we owe? a lot of gratitude. Well said. Excellent discourse ... By: BrianTheMusicMan. on 17 Aug 09, 03:32:05 Excellent discourse!? Where is this segment from? Harald Schmidt - Heidegger Sketch Posted by: abtnihil Video duration: 78 seconds Global video hits: 52172 German TV satirist Harald Schmidt in a sketch incorporating writings by German philosopher Martin Heidegger. Related: martin, heidegger, harald, schmidt, schmidteinander, herbert, feuerstein, philosophie, philosophy, german, sketch, tv, cult, classic Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: Wenn man seinen? ... By: JustinderHalbAmi. on 23 May 11, 19:09:46 Wenn man seinen? Worten glauben schenkt : " Was hat der zweite Weltkrieg eigentlich entschieden, um von seinen furchtbaren Folgen für unser Vaterland, im besonderen vom Riß durch seine Mitte, zu schweigen?" , Ich meine der Riß durch die Mitte, sei der Riß durch das Volk, was dann ja nicht großartig falsch zu verstehen ist. das ist eine ... By: xenantaya. on 14 May 11, 18:34:16 das ist eine berühmte stelle, die schreiber des? sketches wussten also, was sie taten unverstand ist des ... By: Eiskind616. on 09 Nov 10, 23:50:11 unverstand ist des arbeitenden? geistes lohn soweit ich ... By: Lotophagist. on 02 Oct 10, 21:13:39 soweit ich informiert bin hat sich Heidegger eine Reformation der Universität (des Denkens; Zurückgehen auf Parmenides) gewünscht und sah dann die? Möglichkeit zur Erneuerung mit den Nazis gegeben. Später hat er sich davon auch distanziert. Das Thema ist aber immer noch umstritten. Ob es unbedingt Pflicht war vermag ich nicht zu beurteilen. Ich persönlich kann bei Heidegger auch keinen Faschismus finde, aber ich habe mich auch nicht intensiv mit der Frage beschäftigt. Noch? was zum Thema ... By: NielsKoschoreckDE. on 01 Aug 10, 22:40:20 Noch? was zum Thema "Denken": dazu muss ich mal ... By: DavidKuhn83. on 04 Jul 10, 08:12:22 dazu muss ich mal was sagen. Bei der Direktoratsrede Heideggers verabschiedet er sich mit einem Sieg Heil. Warum hat er das gemacht ? nun weil es damals pflicht war. Genauso wie es Pflicht ist zu Klatschen wenn? auf Harald Schmits Aplausschild Applaus aufleuchtet. Ich setze mich erst seit ungefähr 1 Stunde mit Heideker auseinander aber ich glaube nicht das er jemals was gutes über das handeln der Nazis gesagt hat sondern es aus selbstschutz nur mit ..denkt euch den Rest.. Ich finde H.'s ... By: transfixedtornado. on 02 May 10, 01:30:00 Ich finde H.'s Philosophie definitiv nicht "rechts-durchsäucht", aber er war persönlich wohl doch in eine Nazi-Karriere verwickelt. Was man ihm philosophisch eher vorhalten kann ist daß er versucht ein "absolutes" Gebäude aufzubauen und das nicht nur mit sprachlich-denkerischen Argumenten, sondern? auch machmal mit scheinbar bloßen Wortspielen. Trotzdem eine Riesenleistung und definitiv lesbar. Anyway... nichts gegen H.! :) Viel Spaß noch + viele Grüße, TFT Moment mal! :) ... By: transfixedtornado. on 02 May 10, 01:20:59 Moment mal! :) Idiot? Nö/im Gegenteil: jeder sollte Heidegger lesen, es eröffnet eine neue Perspektive auf das eigene Leben. H. ist sowas wie ein "guter Sartre" weil er eben nicht? dir große Gleichgültigkeit der Welt beklagt sondern erstmal die Verantwortlichkeiten des Daseins analysiert. Nur einzelne Begriffe finde ich etwas gefählrich-e.g. die absolute Instanz des "Gewissens" - das ist ja wie wir seit dem 3.Reich Wissen einfach doch recht manipulierbar. Aber es wäre ja ... By: scardanelli1685. on 01 May 10, 16:26:40 Aber es wäre ja schon seltsam, wenn ein Denker den konformen Massenmenschen, der durch und durch "Man" ist, idealisieren würde, oder? ;-) Das hätte auch Adorno nicht getan, der zwar mit ganz anderen Kategorien und Utopien gearbeitet hat, aber in der Kritik der Technisierung & des Konformismus, also in der Sache, oft gar nicht so weit von Heidegger weg war. Dass war auch "man" sind,? ist normal, wenn wir es fast nur noch sind (Massenmedien, Massendenke), wirds problematisch --- Übrigens möchte ... By: scardanelli1685. on 01 May 10, 16:13:36 --- Übrigens möchte ich nebenbei mal klarstellen, dass ich "Sein und Zeit" auch nicht in Bausch und Bogen nur toll finde und schon gar nicht Heidegger im Ganzen - aber diese einfache Art (nicht von dir) ihn hier als "Idiot" oder "Nazi" abzutun, ist einfach zu billig ... ich habe beim Lesen von Sein und? Zeit zwichen Erhellungen und Unverständnis, zwischen Faszination und Abscheu geschwankt ... naja, klar ist ein wenig Wertung dabei Ich find's ja auch ... By: transfixedtornado. on 01 May 10, 15:44:56 Ich find's ja auch toll - hatte nach der Lektüre definitiv mehr Bewußtsein für meinen eigenen Beitrag dazu wie sich mein Leben ereignet. Finde aber schon daß er ein wenig bewertet - nicht direkt mit "Du sollst" aber doch subtil in der Wahl der Begriffe, z.B. "Gerede"/"Verfallen" etc.. Ein wenig problematisch finde ich tatsächlich den Begriff der "Eigentlichkeit", da steckt immernoch ein gewisser Stress und? eine etwas gefährliche Unklarheit drin. Er analysiert nur. ... By: scardanelli1685. on 01 May 10, 10:01:31 Er analysiert nur. Und er sagt, dass jeder auch immer wieder "man" sein muss, man kann nicht immer eigentlich sein. Sonst könnte man gar nicht in menschlichen Gesellschaften? leben. --- Aber solche ... By: scardanelli1685. on 01 May 10, 09:59:27 --- Aber solche Irrtümer "stecken" nicht in der Philosophie, sie ist nicht "verseucht", wie dauernd behauptet wird von "linker" Seite, mit dem Argument, Heidegger? hat ja die Nazis ne Weile gut gefunden ----- es behauptet ja auch niemand Blochs Philosophie sei durch und durch verseucht, weil er Stalin gut fand?! Er hat sogar die Säuberungen(!) begrüßt ... Und noch was: das "Man" ist nicht "schlecht", es ist nur nicht eigentlich - Heidegger sagt nie: "man soll" sorry, der letzte ... By: transfixedtornado. on 01 May 10, 00:51:42 sorry, der letzte Satz sollte Lauten: Ist man vielleicht anstatt dem? Alltag zu verfallen existenziell dazu bestimmt dem Deutschen Volk zum Endsieg zu verhelfen? :) Verstehe Dich schon ... By: transfixedtornado. on 01 May 10, 00:49:20 Verstehe Dich schon! Finde halt es kommt drauf an wie man H. interpretiert: Man soll ja nicht dem "man" verfallen, sondern die Eigentlichkeit/Authentizität finden, die das "Sein zum Tode" in? sich trägt: Und die spricht nun mal im eigenen Gewissen. Was aber, wenn einem der Führer ins Gewissen quatscht? Hat man aus Angst vor dem Verfallen in den Alltag vielleicht glatt übersehen, daß man existenziell dazu bestimmt ist, dem Deutschen Volk zum Endsieg zu verhelfen? :) Dann hast du die ... By: scardanelli1685. on 30 Apr 10, 23:21:50 Dann hast du die EIGENtlichkeit aber nicht verstanden - ich hab mich bei seiner tollen Analyse des "Man" eher? gewundert, dass H. auf so eine Massenhysterie reinfallen konnte ... ich finde, "Sein und Zeit" hat gar nichts faschistoides ... es geht mehr von existenziell gefühlter Eigenverantwortlichkeit aus ... heidegger hat die ... By: MrBlazer. on 09 Feb 10, 01:33:20 heidegger hat die philosophie zu ende getrieben, und stand damit in seiner forderung nach unbedingter opferbereitschaft und unterordnung des menschen nicht nur praktisch,? sondern auch theoretisch dem faschismus nahe. Ich finde Heidegger ... By: transfixedtornado. on 12 Dec 09, 22:27:30 Ich finde Heidegger garnicht so schlecht - was ersagt mag zwar im nachhinein "banal" erscheinen, aber auch nur deshalb weil es einfach ziemlich selbstverständlich zutrifft. Für mich war "Sein und Zeit" definitiv ein Lebens-Wendepunkt. Aber jedem das Seine, man? muß ja nicht alles versprachlichen... Der Mann war halt auch unheimlich stark ins 3.Reich - ein wenig kann man das seinen Ideen schon auch ansehen... bei seiner "Eigentlichkeit" muß nur mal ein Führer diktieren was gemacht wird. Heidegger ist ein ... By: 1peter18. on 12 Dec 09, 20:40:07 Heidegger ist ein Idiot.? Er erfindet neue Wörter für banale Sachverhalte. Naja, so richtig ... By: transfixedtornado. on 12 Nov 09, 17:06:10 Naja, so richtig ins Fürsorgende Mitsein mit den? anderen reingestoßen wirkt der Harald Schmidt in dem Sketch ja nicht. Die hier erwähnte Entschlossenheit kommt übrigens aus dem gedanklichen Vorlaufen in den Tod - dem sogennannten "sein zum Tode". Heidegger ist eigentlich garnicht so kompliziert, ich weiß garnicht was die Leute immer haben. :P Das 'In-der-Welt- ... By: schnacker77. on 27 Apr 09, 20:38:07 Das 'In-der-Welt-Sein' - in diesem/r Falle der Philosph im Männerwohnheim macht ja grade den komischen - fast schon surrealen und doch irgendwie sehr realen, scheinbaren Kontrast. Weltferne Sprechblasen from the gutter. Greetz from Absurdistan. Die Pythons haben's auch? gemacht. Wenn du humorlos ... By: MiauZi69. on 21 Aug 08, 15:42:39 Wenn du humorlos bist, solltest du dir vlt. so etwas nicht ansehen... und ja der Fußballclip Dtl. vs Griechenland war ziemlich genial... aber einfach flach sich über die Sprache lustig zu machen, weil er nicht? fähig ist, sie zu verstehen hat 0,00% Anspruch und Kreativität in sich. Du meinst, ... By: lieberso. on 28 Jul 08, 22:55:04 Du meinst, Heidegger sollte lieber Fußball spielen?? An sich kein guter ... By: MiauZi69. on 17 Jun 08, 17:12:32 An sich kein guter Sketch. Man? kann sich natürlich über Heidegger "seltsame" Sprache lustig machen, jedoch nicht in dieser Art von Ambiente. Was Schmidt hier mit seiner Darstellung präsentiert ist eine mangelnde Reflexion die er nicht nötig hat. Da Lob ich mir doch Monty Python... Den Text musst du ... By: monkfishseye. on 07 May 07, 09:03:56 Den Text musst du in einen gallertartigen,? stumpf bekifften Menschenknäuel hinein vortragen!!! höhö Heidegger, part 1 Posted by: apolloxias Video duration: 656 seconds Global video hits: 9651 Entitled Opinions Robert Harrison talks with Andrew Mitchell about Martin Heidegger. www.stanford.edu Related: entitled, opinions, martin, heidegger, robert, harrison, andrew, mitchell, philosophy, being, and, time, metaphysics, ontology, existentialism, authenticity, technology, dasein, phenomenology Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: Are they Nietzsche- ... By: Israe5l. on 18 Dec 11, 23:52:12 Are they Nietzsche-esque? Read some Nietzsche then. I don't know who else is omnipotent, except God. I am not sure reading the Bible will help in that? case. I accept that. ... By: SteffanLlwyd. on 18 Dec 11, 12:50:10 I accept that. Even now I can see inclinations in colleagues that are fascistic, especially omnipotent behaviour. What does one say to? them? Nothing or Being. ... By: Israe5l. on 18 Dec 11, 03:55:27 Nothing or Being. Silence or Language. The East or the West. I am not sure in the West that we live, we can settle this without having a dialogue about it. And because of it is "off-the-scale" that is the very reason we should discuss it. It gives a? category that are significant. A new language that we need to struggle. It was such an evil ... By: SteffanLlwyd. on 17 Dec 11, 17:11:16 It was such an evil that it bankrupts language just trying? to discuss it. Kind of off-the-scale. Nazi...I know its a ... By: Israe5l. on 16 Dec 11, 23:23:55 Nazi...I know its a evil thing. But what came out of it? It is done and over. So now what perspective should we take. By studying the holocaust we will learn what is evil. And we will not repeat it. Perhaps with Christianity? we have defined what is individual evil (the idea of heaven and hell). But with holocaust we have learned social evil. I think I am not ... By: Israe5l. on 25 Nov 11, 23:42:23 I think I am not argueing for "plural" anything. In fact I am argueing for a? rough dualism. Negative is opposite of positive. As simple as that. There is something about 2 that we can not get away from. So I will not go for the "four" voices, as it is. But doesn't mean dualism is the only thing. Its just "rough". Maybe I will go along with the "clumsy". Thanks for your ... By: SteffanLlwyd. on 24 Nov 11, 19:40:36 Thanks for your reply. I agree that appreciation? (and use of 'plural rationalities') may be beneficial. My favourite version of this argument is known as Cultural Theory (note capital C and T). It proposes 'clumsy solutions' developed out of a dialogue between four voices: the hierarchical, egalitarian, fatalistic and individualistic. Look out for Michael Thompson's Youtube vid. Let us know what you think... First, big chunk of ... By: Israe5l. on 23 Nov 11, 02:46:29 First, big chunk of the last century philosophy was about how? to deal with negativity. Because, it seems as though now we are not going to live without it. Another word for "negativity" is "sensitize". By learning different philosophy and perspective we begin to live with and treat others about their pain in much more detached way. "Detached" is a good thing (much like objectivity). The doctor should not get sick while treating his patients. (Or should he?) I find it hard to ... By: SteffanLlwyd. on 18 Nov 11, 16:53:57 I find it hard to take lectures about exploitation from a guy who was a Nazi and? who heaped praise on the Party (machine). I find this to be ... By: TheDavid2222. on 22 Sep 11, 20:01:58 I find this to be much more interesting than analytic philosophy. But that's just me I guess.? I? don't see ... By: Israe5l. on 09 Mar 11, 02:46:30 I? don't see anything wrong with concepts. Perhaps we need to have symbols to talk of psychic and inner most matter, but if we are going to make sharp arguements we need concepts. "a critical tool" sounds exctly what concepts do. I don't know whats ... By: Israe5l. on 09 Mar 11, 02:44:13 I don't know whats wrong about concepts. Perhaps without symbols we will not? be able to talk of matters that are important in our psych and inner most. But, we won't be able to do philosophy without concepts. "a critical tool" sounds like a conceptual tool. We can't make sharp arguements without concepts. It is true that ... By: Israe5l. on 06 Mar 11, 03:10:34 It is true that Hegel was the philospher of philosphers (and very systemic). But Kant was the philospher of great philosophers. Without Kant we probably never would had human (social) science. Hegelians are? great because of Marxism. But Kant's synthetic apriori was western philosophy's first step into society as a concept. Something within ... By: GordonMorrice. on 13 Feb 11, 04:59:30 Something within our galaxy has occurred. It happened in an immeasurable may. How to measure it, how to declare that event in detail without reverting to metaphor, ie in a? New Age way? I keep thinking ... By: Israe5l. on 10 Feb 11, 02:26:17 I keep thinking philosophers are systematic thinkers. Which probably is not true. When it gets down to it, maybe Hegel, Kant, and Husserl, and some others few were systematic. I guess most philosophers are after themes. Heidegger's beef was Being. How we can? have an authentic relation with Being. What is the best way to question Being. What kind of answer did Dasein expect. Was it a new kind of living? This guy talks like ... By: S2Cents. on 30 Jul 10, 05:13:49 This guy talks like you know _"I am saying profound stuff now"_ and then fumbles words occasionally? and sounds shaky using some of these words. Not a very competent speaker. Heidegger was a ... By: natedaug1. on 05 Jul 10, 09:33:47 Heidegger was a Nazi, which no likes. His philosophy was not? about Nazism, it was ontology. I? must say that ... By: blackneos940. on 09 Feb 10, 02:50:58 I? must say that Entitled Opinions is my favorite thing to listen to online, and iPod. Vattimo racconta Heidegger sintesi 1 Posted by: vsilviotube Video duration: 598 seconds Global video hits: 17451 Essere e Tempo, Related: filosofia, heidegger Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: Dopo l'aver dovuto ... By: Jackgb1981. on 29 Feb 12, 21:05:47 Dopo l'aver dovuto accettare la morte di dio e la metamorfosi del superuomo in una squallida massa, ai liberi pensatori, non resta altro che l'esistenzialismo, per cui il senso della vita, diventa la vita stessa. Esistenza inaspettata e non voluta; evento che merita quindi una programmazione ed una risoluzione. A il mio modo di vedere, il precursore dei meccanismi logici di Heidegger è stato Sun Tzu. Il Nichilismo alla base del pragmatismo? esistenziale; questo è Heidegger. Con i puntini ... By: GhenaDimitrova. on 26 Feb 12, 10:59:35 Con i puntini voglio alludere che voler parlare di Heidegger in maniera esaustiva semplicemente commentandolo?? in un portale come questo è riduttivo, non è neanche completa la dissertazione di Vattimo! Non sono stitica, non ho bisogno di sciogliermi, sono forse essenzialista e profondamente telegrafica. Ad ognuno il suo. (...) :D in questa tua ... By: SuperDiciotto. on 25 Feb 12, 18:37:20 in questa tua affermazione usi due verbi : sapere ed intendere, ma purtroppo non dai un contenuto a nessuno dei due, in più ci metti una fondamentale categoria della logica modale: è necessario.Con i puntini vuoi alludere alla tua capacità di saper intendere? i contenuti della filosofia del filosofo nazista a differenza del sottoscritto ma sei troppo stitica, sciogliti e parla. Bisogna saperlo ... By: GhenaDimitrova. on 23 Feb 12, 23:39:39 Bisogna saperlo intendere Heidegger? :) ... a me? sembra un ... By: 64jonny. on 16 Feb 12, 22:08:48 a me? sembra un imbecille Io ho studiato ... By: MyAxel3000. on 23 Jan 12, 22:09:01 Io ho studiato Heidegger abbastanza? in profondità ed ho trovato questo pensatore molto interessante nel panorama esistenzialista. cogito..ergo sum... ... By: MrTarcisio43. on 15 Nov 11, 22:28:03 cogito..ergo sum...continuo a? chiedermi:chi sono..e mi trovo spaesato.. SuperDiciotto@ ... By: themarilena67. on 14 Oct 11, 17:32:58 SuperDiciotto@ vediamo: se sono frutto di un semplice atto sessuale mi sono? scelta di venire al mondo? NO!!!! qualcuno ha scelto per me:coloro che mi hanno generata,o no?e nn è questo un grande limite alla mia liberta'? questo è il tema principale della filosofia esistenzialista: l'Essere buttati nel mondo senza averne fatto scelta alcuna! A seguire, parliamo dei contenurti della coscienza NON PERDERE TEMPO? ... By: SuperDiciotto. on 14 Oct 11, 14:34:36 NON PERDERE TEMPO? PREZIOSO , IN QUELLI COME HEIDEGGER NON C'E' ALCUNCHE' DA CAPIRE. perchè dire " io ... By: SuperDiciotto. on 14 Oct 11, 14:32:15 perchè dire " io sono gettato nel mondo ", invece di dire " mi trovo in un ambiente " ? Questa dell'esserci mi sembra una banalità, anche il fatto di Usare originariamente l'ambiente è scontato, che le nostre azioni abbiano un fine, non significa che? IO SIA IL PROGETTO delle mie azioni, da questa confusione nasce il fumo negli occhi di questa filosofia, a mio parere l'esistenzialismo di questo gufo ( asomiglia proprio ad un gufo heidegger ), è SOLO UNA PRESA IN GIRO. Certo che per ... By: SuperDiciotto. on 14 Oct 11, 14:29:14 Certo che per scoprire il limte della propria libertà non è necessario intraprendere una lettura di essere e tempo, poi tu , la tua coscienza , non è frutto se non del tuo sistema nervoso centrale, si nasce da un semplice atto sessuale e non c'è alcun progetto.Vedo proprio la mancanza di un progetto originario come libertà di interpretazione della realtà, apri gli occhi , il tuo vero tesoro è l'accesso che hai in? prima persona ai contenuti della tua coscienza Grande Vattimo *_*? By: erigone99. on 11 Sep 11, 00:26:05 Grande Vattimo *_*? Casualmente gettati ... By: themarilena67. on 03 Sep 11, 09:43:56 Casualmente gettati nel Mondo. Ne Deriva che, sono frutto di una tradizione storica,di un Progetto gia' Costituito e intorno a questo ruota? tutto l'Esistenzialismo. Condizioni venute a me e il mio Interagire è sempre in rapporto al Condizionamento gia' Precostituito a Me.Dunque la mia scelta è limitata,la mia Liberta' è Limitata. heidegger è uno dei ... By: maiononloso1. on 03 Jul 11, 16:42:57 heidegger è uno dei filosofi più difficili? da capire ma è uno dei migliori a mio parere e dei più interessanti Interessante ... By: MrApeiron1. on 05 Mar 11, 00:06:41 Interessante Black.le avevo risposto sull'altro video.lei scrive cose molto interessanti,trattando un filosofo molto interessante.Ma ecco,visto che lei aveva avanzato un'osservazione e io avevo risposto,pensavo fosse il caso di chiarire.Se poi non lo ritiene necessario,la saluto augurandole? ogni bene! L'uomo è quell'ente ... By: odisseoblack. on 20 Feb 11, 23:27:28 L'uomo è quell'ente la cui essenza corrisponde alla sua esistenza. Il linguaggio è la casa dell'essere;e l'uomo è il pastore dell'essere. Se il linguaggio si deteriora, esso svanisce in "chiacchiera". La poesia (dichtung) custodisce il segreto dell'essere; e l'ente svela e al contempo nasconde l'essere stesso. L'essere? non è da intendersi come causa dell'ente, poichè non produce l'ente, ma solo ritraendosi fa in modo che abbia luogo l'ente. Perchè l'essere piuttosto che il nulla? "mi penso già ... By: altroveable. on 03 Nov 10, 15:18:24 "mi penso già sempre in base a un sistema? di coordinate[...]storicamente qualificato" il linguaggio è la ... By: MegaCheccone. on 01 Nov 10, 22:21:30 il linguaggio è la casa? dell'essere. l'esistenza è? un ... By: MegaCheccone. on 01 Nov 10, 22:19:57 l'esistenza è? un progetto gettato! affascinante? By: robi7800. on 08 May 10, 18:27:38 affascinante? Grazie per questi ... By: fucksimil3. on 24 Feb 10, 18:05:43 Grazie per questi video. Molto utili! ps:? mitico Gianni! Heidegger's Black Forest - Part 1 of 5 Posted by: MLDW00DSU Video duration: 608 seconds Global video hits: 12718 Martin Heidegger's Black Forest Related: philosophy, martin, heidegger, black, forest, michael, woods Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: I was looking at a ... By: S2Cents. on 08 May 12, 02:48:01 I was looking at a talk on Godel. Heidegger is certainly closer to mystics and poets and priests than logicians, scientists, mathematicians... I mean I wanted to compare these two giants of? 20th cent. intellectual history and that's like comparing a master painter, say Matisse, with ....never mind that analogy doesn't work either. I couldn't resist ... By: twintigtwaalf. on 28 Feb 10, 18:24:37 I couldn't resist watching all five. For me it doesnot matter if it were a devil that took me to the light.? In this line of evolution Heidegger probably will not be surpassed. Agree. Much ... By: shakeyourdimsims. on 24 Sep 09, 08:42:24 Agree. Much appreciated? for posting Thank you for ... By: PedroAlonsoLopez. on 07 Mar 09, 14:30:47 Thank you for posting this. The previous comments sadden me in their superficiality, but? what can be done. Fantastic! Lol ... By: LordImmolation. on 30 Jun 08, 14:32:33 Fantastic! Lol You've got your first subscriber! Glad to have discovered you! Welcome to youtube - best? of luck, not of course that you will need it! Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40   How to meet women Related Videos How To Meet Women On Facebook - How To Meet Women Online - How To Meet Exotic Foreign Women - How Do Widowers Meet Women - How To Meet Local Single Women - How Do Women Meet Men - How To Meet Women Off Facebook You like it? Share it! Social Bookmarking

How to meet women videos :: Videos are copyright their respective owners :: Feedback powered by: Customer Feedback