Epistemology video compilations

What do we know and what do we believe? Music ... Posted by: FantasticBabblings Video duration: 661 seconds Global video hits: 9845 What do we know and what do we believe? Music by Kevin MacLeod www.incompetech.com Related: know, believe, epistemology, unknown, science, religion, faith, reason, fantasticbabblings Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: WOW!!!just..WOW!! ... By: im10pplok. on 04 Mar 12, 17:20:29 WOW!!!just..WOW!!subbed:)? Very interesting? ... By: dotspace77. on 24 Dec 11, 16:34:23 Very interesting? and clear, thanks. cool hwip? By: rydhwan. on 20 Dec 11, 20:53:39 cool hwip? I am confused. Im ... By: MrKingatheist. on 25 Jul 11, 21:33:03 I am confused. Im into ethics, in philosophy. Where does Epistemology fit into ethics. Also where does metaphysics fit into ethics? whats the difference between Epistemology and metaphysics? how do they effect moral theorys in philosophy? ? This is so ... By: TheSteinmetzen. on 13 Jun 11, 07:19:23 This is so insightful.? Thanks! "I am the wisest ... By: ScalerWave. on 12 May 11, 21:23:30 "I am the wisest man alive, for I know one thing, and that? is that I know nothing." Socrates @0zyzzyz0 Thanks ... By: FantasticBabblings. on 09 Jan 11, 21:35:37 @0zyzzyz0 Thanks for your comment. The problem with getting into the academic thinking on the? subject is that it easily becomes a quagmire as you so rightly said. That type of exegesis is best written so the reader can go back and re-read and jump back and forth. Not really suited to a video. The favorite button is now under the "Add to" button. Thanks again. The philosophy of ... By: The1066Al. on 30 Nov 10, 22:57:05 The philosophy of materialism ultimately relies for its? validity on strong empiricism: "all knowledge derives from sense perception". Trouble is that that idea does not itself derive from sense perception. Hence the epistemology on which materialism (and therefore atheism) depends is self-refuting. If there is any philosophy which is irrational it is materialism, since matter cannot account for the objective validity of reason, in other words, for 'mind'. thank you. ? By: tiediegoddess. on 13 Jul 10, 15:29:54 thank you. ? about the last line ... By: oiuoiu988. on 01 May 10, 21:15:44 about the last line in your video, positivism has been used chiefly as a justification for imposing the will? of the people in power onto the masses, dont pretend it somehow helps individual freedom. and let me just add ... By: oiuoiu988. on 01 May 10, 21:12:52 and let me just add that your main problem is that youre trying to apply the epistemological underpinnings of PHYSICAL science to social science where it has absolutely no place because it(knowledge of social science) cannot? be falsified. logical positivism ... By: oiuoiu988. on 01 May 10, 21:09:10 logical positivism is in direct conflict with logic & reason, it has become a religion unto itself... putting verifiability ahead of logic, reason and philosophical investigation is the calling card of the 20th century religious positivist psuedo-intellectual. you seem to be trapped in about 1987 or so... is it fair to APPLY ANYTHING TO EVERYONE? how does this application take place? the need to apply something to everyone is just vile statist rhetoric and you seem to be a complete dupe.? Thanks for this, I ... By: moyga. on 20 Apr 10, 12:01:33 Thanks for this, I am studying Epistemology at the? moment and I really liked that little diagram you made, I'd never seen JTB as K expressed visually like that. you are? narrow ... By: Triumph919. on 14 Apr 10, 21:33:59 you are? narrow minded.. i dont like you... Thanks for the ... By: 1SikBR. on 28 Feb 10, 15:38:42 Thanks for the effort, and while I agree with most? of what you said, the background music is too distracting. What do you mean by ... By: billhuston. on 01 Jan 10, 03:33:49 What do you mean by "fantasy"? You claim no bias, yet it is there. The courts should stick to what is true, right? People have been imprisoned for? being delusional. Isn't that just name-calling and judgement? I say your claim that "evidentiary knowledge" exists is a fantasy! Please show me some. If you look deeply here, you will find an unsolvable paradox. I prefer RAW's term, "reality tunnel". Everyone has their own. This term avoids the possible pejorative :) I also stated that ... By: FantasticBabblings. on 01 Jan 10, 02:53:02 I also stated that I have my own imaginative (fantasy) world, so if I am being pejorative (not perjorative) I am also disparaging myself. This video expresses no judgment of fantasies, just an effort to separate them from evidentiary knowledge. The diagram is merely an exemplar, not an effort? to show the actual proportions of truth and falsity. I'm sure all views are true... in someone's fantasy world. A lot of good stuff ... By: billhuston. on 01 Jan 10, 00:19:47 A lot of good stuff here. Thanks for sharing. In the last statement, "Everyone should be free to believe their own fantasy world", isn't that a judgment, perjorative? By "fantasy world" do you mean "false view?" Why not? just say, "everyone should be free"? How would you (or anyone) know, a priori, that a particular view was a fantasy or not? There is another area of possibility which your Venn diagram did not cover. And that is the possibility that all views are true. very good video? ... By: chucie5. on 04 Nov 09, 08:49:58 very good video? phil ...deep Yeah, I hear all ... By: olstrawberries. on 13 Oct 09, 08:24:18 Yeah, I hear all that, but sometimes and I do mean only sometimes, in order to fully experience the strangeness and and intensity of art or? fantasy or the subconscious, we have to let go completely from this 'skill' you mentioned of separating that which is speculative and that which has been scientifically integrated. We must not let reason abdicate the throne of intuition but maybe they could sit together a while and avoid the pitfalls of extreme ignorance. Science is magic, magic is science. "A weak atheist ... By: ogirv101. on 06 Oct 09, 10:56:44 "A weak atheist says there is no evidence to suggest any gods exist and on those grounds I don't believe any do." Is that not a negative proof fallacy,? just awnser, that's what it sounds like to me. Also Agnosticism and ATheism are not mutually exclusive, but Theism isn't either. All the names ... By: ogirv101. on 05 Oct 09, 18:44:17 All the names you've mentioned do suggest strong atheistic characteristics, for example Dawkins says he's near sure that God doesn't exist and knows for sure religion is wrong (and he makes a strawman argument about the way all religions work and believe.) Dawkins claims that all? religions rely on blind faith, that's a strawman argument, and focuses on literal interpretations of scripture to make his arguments, this is absurd and a strawman argument. Oh your brand of ... By: ogirv101. on 02 Oct 09, 22:22:49 Oh your brand of Atheism is alot different than what most of the younger Atheists are. I'm surprised to find an ATheist liek you, and no matter how much it hurts me, your belief system is respectable. Furthermore, I probably didn't listen, I just feel like arguing with? someone right now, I'm a very contentious person and simple conversations seem banal to me. It depends on your ... By: FantasticBabblings. on 02 Oct 09, 22:05:39 It depends on your definition of atheism. For me, it means I have no gods; it does not mean I insist that no god exists. Atheists themselves argue and split hairs over the meaning and I have no interest in pursuing that? argument. I did NOT say knowledge is justification. I said it is the result of justification of that which is true and believed. You either didn't listen or aren't very bright. Atheism is seen as ... By: ogirv101. on 02 Oct 09, 19:39:34 Atheism is seen as illogical in epistemologial terms. Skepticism is alright and is needed,? but extreme recalcitrance passed as skepticism is a threat to Science. Furthermore you started off with knowledge being justification. No, justification isn't knowledge. The Philosophy and Epistemology of René Descartes Posted by: wmiller24 Video duration: 1086 seconds Global video hits: 9387 This is a short video about the philosophy and epistemology of René Descartes, discussing his "method of doubt" and his famous statement "Cogito ergo sum." Related: rené, descartes, philosophy, epistemology, method, of, doubt, hyperbolic, cogito, ergo, sum, rationalist, rationalism, father, modern, cartesian, coordinates Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: Thank you? for ... By: LizzyT123. on 12 Apr 12, 00:00:00 Thank you? for explaining it so well! LEt her know that ... By: ocelot435. on 27 Mar 12, 19:30:11 LEt her know that your pipe is the king , bang? it ! We takin' this? ass ... By: bryanFskates69. on 22 Mar 12, 20:04:23 We takin' this? ass to the white house. Thank? you very ... By: pgpalito. on 17 Mar 12, 08:48:40 Thank? you very much this really helped me understand descartes ... You made it sooo simple thanks again i give the dick, ... By: ross54535. on 05 Mar 12, 21:24:54 i give the dick, therefore? i am Why couldn't the ... By: Gruenders. on 19 Feb 12, 22:44:27 Why couldn't the evil demon deceive Descartes' senses to the point where he believes that he is thinking, but in fact he is just being manipulated by the demon? Also, why couldn't Descartes' strong convictions about? perfection be results of the evil demon's manipulation of his senses? Im taking a ... By: hiphopfish88. on 07 Feb 12, 00:56:59 Im taking a Philosophy call right now, I really enjoy? this particular topic of Epistemology. His island is his ... By: TheaDragonSpirit. on 23 Jan 12, 06:46:22 His island is his subjective thoughs and views. How does he work out their is objective? truths or facts. Very? informative! ... By: Msncgal. on 16 Jan 12, 19:33:09 Very? informative! Thank you for explaining this!! ive honestly ... By: 88roro11. on 31 Dec 11, 08:10:50 ive honestly thought this? before.. but i was on alot of mushrooms or acid..i drew some wild stuff.. i wrote my thoughts down the next day, that what if this is all a dream.. or schizophrenic reality.... or what if this is afterlife? Very good! Helped ... By: RobFS1. on 14 Dec 11, 03:33:02 Very good! Helped me? a lot. :) Great video! Easy ... By: NickoDrummer. on 09 Dec 11, 08:21:01 Great video! Easy to understand and short enough to remember! I hope Descartes will show up for tomorrows? exam, so that I can use this as an inspiration for what I'm writing! Thanks! Baruch? de Spinoza, ... By: alifeofreason. on 07 Dec 11, 03:36:22 Baruch? de Spinoza, the greatest philosopher to ever live. ..who?? By: ArkansasHarvest. on 07 Dec 11, 03:32:33 ..who?? His influence is ... By: cl1mbat1ze. on 24 Nov 11, 09:33:57 His influence is probably less known or harder to pinpoint because Spinozas work was largely banned after he died. But there's no doubt he's had a major influence on modern philosophy despite this, more than descartes though? Hard to say, but I'dd love to hear your opinion? :) I'm writing a paper on the two philosophers and their infuence on philosophy and modern science. hyper bollocks? ... By: thisisacunt. on 14 Nov 11, 08:49:45 hyper bollocks? hahahah Spinoza really ... By: alifeofreason. on 25 Oct 11, 05:34:50 Spinoza really started? modern philosophy. Rene was ahead of ... By: Blodwen0404. on 29 Sep 11, 12:37:17 Rene was ahead of his times... He foresaw how the leaders of our present control system of thinking are possessed by demons... He tapped into the future philosophy in order to teach those of his original philosophy... ? I doubt he would agree with my own view point, I now doubt what I have written, now I'm going back in time... Doubt everything... ... By: Blodwen0404. on 29 Sep 11, 12:30:22 Doubt everything... That's my kind of philosophy... I doubt I even exist if I do I'm not typing? this message to know I'm existing... Probably a bit more ... By: boardfu. on 26 Jul 11, 06:29:46 Probably a bit more well received than anything? Luther had to say hm? As a matter of fact ... By: wmiller24. on 25 Jul 11, 19:55:14 As a matter of fact, Descartes was trying to use? reason and philosophy to provide a foundation for faith and for belief in Catholic doctrine. Unfortunately for him, even though he was trying to defend Catholicism, his theories were not universally welcomed by the Catholic Church. thanks alot of help ... By: skaballtheory. on 23 Jul 11, 02:45:11 thanks alot of help!!! ? Great video! Easy ... By: boardfu. on 13 Jul 11, 09:53:38 Great video! Easy to listen to: Clear and Concise. Myself personally I might have mentioned the empiricists while touching base with the idea of rationalism. I just wonder where Descartes came up with the idea of perfection as being the explanation for god? I personally might argue that perfection is merely in the mind of the beholder, as I somehow feel you might agree with. Sounds almost? like he was trying to not get in trouble with the church :-p ? gl then =D By: 93CuteGurl. on 25 May 11, 11:01:34 ? gl then =D Introduction: What Epistemology Is Posted by: CEEChannel Video duration: 153 seconds Global video hits: 6763 Dr.Stephen Hicks, Professor of Philosophy at Rockford College and CEE's Executive Director, presents a series of lectures on the philosophy of education. In Part 3, Dr. Hicks gives an overview of epistemology. In this section, he defines epistemology. Related: dr stephen hicks, rockford college, cee, lecture, course, philosophy, education, epistemology Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: Thak you Dr. Hicks. ... By: mysoukouss. on 05 Jul 11, 19:09:45 Thak you Dr. Hicks. Your explanational is very easy to understand because you explain it in a clear non technical language. Please post more and talk? about paradigmes. Wht are paradigmes? od bless you first respons: Too ... By: KeesFluitman. on 17 Apr 11, 15:07:21 first respons: Too much balancing. Quite annoying.? What is Epistemology? Posted by: dtouey Video duration: 454 seconds Global video hits: 5355 Related: what, is, epistemology Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: It's the? dude from ... By: rexsl88. on 03 Mar 10, 09:28:39 It's the? dude from House. Really effective, ... By: verylikeakitten. on 28 Feb 10, 12:11:19 Really effective, lucid introduction to epistemology. Thank you. Have noted your other videos. Is there a particular one? that follows on from this one? I think you look a ... By: Zepher50. on 26 Jan 10, 16:38:39 I think you look a little? like Greg House. 1. Ayn Rand Objectivist Epistemology Posted by: drjasonjcampbell Video duration: 651 seconds Global video hits: 2489 www.jasonjcampbell.o rg Related: ayn, rand, objectivist, epistemology Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: it's cool to be ... By: drjasonjcampbell. on 11 May 12, 03:43:20 it's cool to be different :-)? Well original ideas ... By: skwuim. on 10 May 12, 18:04:11 Well original ideas is what drives humanity forth, not the constant repetition of old dogmatic? mantras. "There is not an ... By: MoDonJon. on 01 May 12, 08:30:08 "There is not an advancement in the existence of Humanity that cannot? be traced to some form of community effort, resource,? or knowledge.That single fact negates? that entire philosophy of Objectivism. It's impossible to act with 'rational self-interest' without having the community before you act in the public interest." DonJon. So without the ... By: ReligionlessFAITH. on 05 Apr 12, 23:29:20 So without the ability? to be cognizantly aware, well, that chicken would just die. The only reason it lived so long is cause someone kept jamming corn down its throat. err sorry, headless ... By: ReligionlessFAITH. on 05 Apr 12, 23:23:16 err sorry, headless chicken lives... so, that is the ultimate example of unconcious? awareness. no eyes, no ears, no smell, no taste... sensory inputs down to touch alone. While the chicken with no head is still alive, and walks around for a long time it doesn't have the senses to be aware of its environment, and it doesn't have the brain to be cognizant (aware) of its self. Its awareness is restricted to a subconcious awareness..can't imagin what that must be like. When we sleep, our ... By: ReligionlessFAITH. on 05 Apr 12, 23:13:14 When we sleep, our bodies and brains just slow down to regenerate. The cortex and upper brain functions slow down and enter a sleeping awareness. When we are unconcious, the cortex and upper brain shuts down altogether, and it is our brain stem which contains the autonomic functions...this "awareness" is a subconcious awareness because you have it even if the higher brain dies. /watch?v=ATz3AdbjyRI again... you are ... By: ReligionlessFAITH. on 05 Apr 12, 22:59:09 again... you are not unconcious when you're asleep. ? A drunk...who passes out, or someone who gets knocked out in a fight... These incidents are unconcious states...when nothing can bring the awareness back but some resetting or healing from the unconcious state. your awareness is altered by sleep, you are less aware, but you most certainly are not unconcious because only a slight stimulus will waken you. a sleepwalker is ... By: ReligionlessFAITH. on 05 Apr 12, 22:54:18 a sleepwalker is not unconcious. If you're unconcious, you're passed out... unresponsive to stimulae and unable to? sleepwalk. awareness and ... By: ReligionlessFAITH. on 05 Apr 12, 22:46:53 awareness and conciousness are synonymous... I mentioned that. There is a difference between asleep and unconcious. We are concious while we're asleep even though we might not be aware of, or concious of the shaving cream. ? If we're unconcious...we don't react to the feather, we are more deeply unaware.. Context is important. I can be concious, and aware, concious and unaware, but if I'm unconcious, I'm always unaware (except for subconcious awarenesses like autonomic functions lol... I don't know ... By: ReligionlessFAITH. on 05 Apr 12, 22:11:24 lol... I don't know how we can say that dogs don't recognize their own image. Maybe they do and it just isn't a big deal to them... I mean...that dogbutt in the mirror don't have? no smell right? Dogs intuit in their own way.. they use their senses differently than we do so naturally their perceptions won't be the same as ours. Dogs are very self-aware. We tend to evaluate sentience, by human criteria and often misinterpret the behaviour of other lifeforms. ...but I didn't ... By: merrickwt. on 05 Apr 12, 18:31:05 ...but I didn't want to just come out and say it, so I made my radio analogy to try and point you in the right direction... unconscious awareness is possible: when you roll over in your sleep because of the discomfort-? you are not conscious of it, however, because you're sleeping. You are conscious of your dreams, or of nothing at all while in between dreams (no time passes for the conscious "you", but the aware "you" is still keeping "you" alive). Hence the term "WAKE UP". Essentially, you ... By: merrickwt. on 05 Apr 12, 18:22:53 Essentially, you have it backward; it should read, "unconsious awareness... a sleep walker: capacity to function? without consciousness" You still haven't ... By: merrickwt. on 05 Apr 12, 18:19:40 You still haven't touched on the difference between awareness and consciousness, which was the basis of this entire discussion. You state that unconscious awareness doesn't exist- what about a body's reactions to a feather on the face (with shaving cream in the hand, of course)- the brain is aware of the feather, and the body reacts- unconsciously. Hence why I? use the radio analogy- unconscious awareness is practically mechanical. ok, sir nit-pick, ... By: merrickwt. on 05 Apr 12, 18:17:36 ok, sir nit-pick, I'll update my last line: "...the image in the mirror as an image of? themselves)". Or, "...as their own image)". Happy? In humans, if we ... By: ReligionlessFAITH. on 05 Apr 12, 18:03:15 In humans, if we don't eat, we become hungry. Hunger triggers the urge to eat, it is part of our well-developed survival instinct. We can intuit that similar survival triggers exist in other life forms. Do life forms need to be aware of their existence in order to be aware of ther hunger? perhaps not.. but they do need to be self-aware, to become aware of the environmental actions they? must take in order to satisfy hunger. Psst.. the image in mirror is not you... it's only your image. "Very few actually ... By: merrickwt. on 05 Apr 12, 17:27:41 "Very few actually read it..." far too true, so? much emotional reaction to Rand's irreverant attitude, hardly ever an honest critique of the basis for her further reaching conclusions... so would you agree ... By: merrickwt. on 05 Apr 12, 17:25:53 so would you agree that the two come in tandum- awareness of something means being aware of it as distinct from 'self'; the 'self concept', however, is something that humans, as conceptual beings, have to distinguish us from other animals which are only? self-perceiving, and at a rudimentary level (e.g. dogs don't recognize the image in the mirror as themselves) without self- ... By: ReligionlessFAITH. on 05 Apr 12, 17:12:32 without self-awareness, environmental awareness doesn't happen. All life, even a bacteria must first be aware of itself, in order to become aware of the things in the environment which are not itself, and the things in the environment it can use to satisfy its survival instinct. Different species have varying levels of awareness, and can only perceive and intuit on their level. Ants are more aware than bacteria, and we are more aware than ants. All life is sentient at it's own level.? I would posit that ... By: merrickwt. on 05 Apr 12, 16:33:47 I would posit that self-awareness is a higher-order awareness than awareness of the environment outside an entitiy. However, are you saying that awareness in this context requires conceptual formation? Are ants aware of their environment? If not, why do? they alter their behavior when threatened? How do they get food without being aware of food? Are ants sentient? A radio is a ... By: ReligionlessFAITH. on 05 Apr 12, 15:35:53 A radio is a mschine, like any other machine. If you put all the parts together in the right configuration, a machine will do what it's designed to do. A pair of scissors will cut paper if you put paper between the blades and close them together...are the scissors aware they cut things? No ... its merely a hunk of? sharpened iron. To be aware of external things, first something must be self-aware. Sentience is the requisite for all awareness, without it awareness is not possible. dude, sorry i? made ... By: ReligionlessFAITH. on 05 Apr 12, 15:23:43 dude, sorry i? made fun of what you said. Was thinking about it...you're still wrong, but I was sarcastically making fun of your error. A radio is more than just the receiver. It's a complex machine that involves a transmittor AND a receiver. The receiver has no choice but to process the waves sent by the transmitter. This doesn't mean it's aware of them, it only proves that radio waves can be transmitted, received and processed to create sound waves. Awareness is synonymous to conciousness the radio is aware ... By: RELIGIONLESS faith. on 01 Apr 12, 16:12:22 the radio is aware of them but not concious of them ahem.... excuse me i'm having a bit of trouble typing cause I'm laughing so hard. hehehe ok... gimmee a minit hahaha maybe you'd like to read what you typed, and make a? correction or two before I reply serously...fyi , if you choose to try to support this nonsense i do have a number you can call to get treatment for your condition. I don't believe you are aware of, nore conscious of the irrationality of your claims. concious is being ... By: merrickwt. on 31 Mar 12, 18:12:06 concious is being used as the active awareness of your mind, as experienced while awake and functioning- we are not aware of radio waves but for the concept of them, and the radio is aware of them but not concious of them. When you are asleep and not dreaming, you are aware of your surroundings but? not concious of them (except when the alarm goes off and you hear it in your dream, this could be imagines as the 'border' of conciousness and awareness). Great video!? By: BagofHay. on 05 Feb 12, 22:28:07 Great video!? Epistemological Dichotomies (Which May Be Totally Useless) Posted by: TJdoeslife Video duration: 821 seconds Global video hits: 28070 Also, soul vs. self. Related: epistemology Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: I'm a good? good ... By: Fuzzy192006. on 15 May 12, 06:01:42 I'm a good? good boy, I'm a good good boy, look at me, look at me, I'm a good boy. so... zen? basically By: moondancekid1. on 09 May 12, 21:43:48 so... zen? basically ...I like your ... By: utupoe111. on 06 May 12, 18:49:21 ...I like your shirt? TJ I would disagree ... By: CenarionCult. on 17 Mar 12, 06:26:49 I would disagree with some of? this. Information is a justified fact, or justified truth. Knowledge by definition is a justified true belief. So they are more close than you realize. This proves that people cannot "know" that the God exists regardless of its existence. As far as your definition of "soul". I think homunculus theory encompasses the soul and self in a more clear way. So much wrong here.? By: stallion4life. on 09 Mar 12, 10:11:02 So much wrong here.? it brought tears to ... By: MaxDrotergen. on 21 Feb 12, 15:51:18 it brought tears to my eyes when he said he likes talking to us and that we are? alright. i love you TJ! you give me reason to live. I think your first ... By: ChairmanDrek757. on 29 Jan 12, 20:25:15 I think your first distinction is pointless, but the second one is very important and intriguing.? Great video.? By: mrserenity316. on 17 Jan 12, 00:07:29 Great video.? this is? the ... By: sobored671. on 14 Jan 12, 19:17:05 this is? the perfect place to advertise for CHRISTIAN SINGLES DATING SERVICES >.< /facepalm there? is no self, ... By: ScottieConnorCook. on 28 Dec 11, 01:28:40 there? is no self, only zual! I like you a lot ... By: abasslinelow. on 12 Dec 11, 21:11:38 I like you a lot more when you're not frothing at the mouth and screaming incoherently.? Subscribe! If I were ever to ... By: purplepineapple311. on 10 Dec 11, 06:32:44 If I were ever to meet you someday and just sit and talk about philosophy, art, essentially pointless nothingness for hours, it would probably make my life. I don't know why, but something about you just makes me a lot more comfortable with my? own mindset. This is very ... By: SonofSethoitae. on 24 Nov 11, 19:53:10 This is very Buddhist. Or? rather, Buddhist-like In all seriousness. ... By: SsikG. on 11 Oct 11, 04:49:24 In all seriousness..the way in which TJ? was expressing himself towards the end of this video..i thought maybe..JUST maybe..he was going to say.."Actually you know what.. there might just be a god" He just seemed really interconnected with himself and it started to sound almost spirtual like.. <3? By: FleshHungryFiend. on 09 Oct 11, 23:24:57 One guy with 22 ... By: TheEnglishAtheist1. on 15 Sep 11, 18:08:28 One guy with 22 likes, And me of? which also agrees with you. What the fuck is he ... By: atsukoh. on 20 Jul 11, 07:19:59 What the fuck is he babbling about?? Lose weight TJ. It ... By: ezemdi. on 08 Jul 11, 18:23:11 Lose weight TJ. It allows healthy, well-oxygenated blood to your? brain thereby making you more intelligent. Plus about 7 million other benefits but I won't get it into that. Also, your indigestion might be a result of your overweightness? well it is not ... By: xXRedrogOXx. on 27 May 11, 00:15:13 well it is not necessarily insignificant, because the way you understand the world and how you define certain concepts will affect your behaviour and the way you behave? in every day life can affect others and well you know how it can go from then, i don't think it happens often but it can happen I spent a great ... By: ProfessorCWI. on 22 May 11, 07:20:21 I spent a great deal of my college years up at night contemplating the same damn thing. So now I have this piece of paper that if I tried, I might be able? to cut somebody's throat with it but nevertheless, I do feel totally powerless. Not sure what the ... By: Equalswin. on 12 May 11, 07:07:05 Not sure what the argument is, but intelligence is not necessarily a? constant its called a joke,? ... By: Hazy992. on 03 May 11, 11:33:33 its called a joke,? asshole. seriously get a fucking grip. You are a moron, ... By: TheEnglishAtheist1. on 29 Apr 11, 03:22:53 You are a moron, Intelligence is a constant, Knowledge? is not. Shit man, is THAT ... By: tracygonecrazy1. on 24 Apr 11, 16:21:18 Shit man, is THAT really what? you sit up all night thinking about ? ... "Which May Be Totally Useless", you got that right, it is ! Shit? man, is THAT ... By: tracygonecrazy1. on 24 Apr 11, 16:18:35 Shit? man, is THAT really what you sit up all night thinking about ? Atheism, Reality and Epistemology Posted by: DasAmericanAtheist Video duration: 515 seconds Global video hits: 5119 Finally following up this video: www.youtube.com I won't be this long before my next video--promise! Drawing by: www.youtube.com www.aaronphilby.blog spot.com Music by: www.youtube.com Related: atheism, atheist, theism, theist, christian, christianity, islam, muslim, deist, deism, religion, philosophy, metaphysics, epistemology, solipsism, locke, hume, god, jesus, existence, debate, discussion, dasamericanatheist, yt:stretch=16:9 Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: Sounds a lot like? ... By: Daruqe. on 07 May 12, 22:47:13 Sounds a lot like? logical positivism to me. My approach is ... By: prescod. on 19 Oct 11, 03:57:38 My approach is simpler. It does not rely on special pleading. I simply ask the arguer whether they are willing to take the existence of objective reality and our access to it as an axiom of our discussion. If they say yes, then all of empiricism? flows from that. If they say no, then they will have to discard all of their experience and have an argument in a vacuum of observation, including observation of the Bible or other holy book. This is similar to your fourth argument, but not identical. .So am I perceiving ... By: TheTruthgeneral. on 04 Sep 11, 06:14:52 .So am I perceiving the objective reality ? Well as with all questions of that nature it is dependent on a proper conception of terms.The word refers to all things which are? independent of me.So the question can be restated as am I really perceiving something or or any number of things external to me ? If you are, then everything is settled , by the way you are Objective reality ... By: TheTruthgeneral. on 04 Sep 11, 06:05:32 Objective reality is not an assumption/belief one holds it underlays all such actions.To deny one must first presuppose.So to prsent reasons for and against is? to accept the meaningless statement that it is something that can occur in objective reality for one to disbelief the thesis - objective reality is corresponds to objective reality. It is impossible to ... By: TheTruthgeneral. on 04 Sep 11, 06:00:19 It is impossible to deny reality,as to deny it presupposes a objective reality.If there is no objective reality there are no correct/incorrect affirmations,no knowledge/ignorance no justification for belief or justification for disbelief.Because to deny reality is to affirm it is not in accordance to the objective reality that there is an objective reality in the? first place.It should become evident the contradiction So.I do not believe/disbelieve in objective reality. What came to my ... By: msuders. on 04 Sep 11, 00:49:34 What came to my mind though when I? heard argument 4 was when us atheists doubt the existence of God are we also assuming that the God exists in the first place and thus also self defeating? @derfos666 It'd be ... By: msuders. on 04 Sep 11, 00:46:50 @derfos666 It'd be like the non-realist asking "How do you know that a tree really exists?" There is a kind of hidden assumption that the tree exists in the first place to even be able to doubt it. If something truly doesn't? exist then there shouldn't be a thing there to point to in the first place to make doubting it even possible. There should just be nothing to debate the non existence of. I think that's what he means and hopefully that clears it up. Hey James. I'm not ... By: derfos666. on 09 Aug 11, 00:34:44 Hey James. I'm not sure I got? your fourth argument. How exactly do you believe anti-realists assume reality to question it? Is it by going "look at that! it doesn't actually exist"? If so, I'm not sure that's a very strong point. Can you please clarify it for me? At first I was ... By: slickrick9009. on 27 Jul 11, 08:10:14 At first I was thinking you were going to cause me to have to go through and reevaluate? a few of my arguments but by the end I decided I they were alright, considering I've gone through both of the last two arguments before and come to the same conclusions. My dad and I were debating whether reality was real and I used the last two. I've never heard the first two though. On a side (read: completely random) note: the still frame for this (over on the side in the suggestions area) is great... lol WTF is reality? why ... By: Forkroute. on 26 Jul 11, 19:05:14 WTF is reality? why deal with a word like plato? ask what people mean when they use the word. Epistemology should be a part of? psychology. I have a problem ... By: Hyardacil. on 08 Apr 11, 21:53:31 I have a problem with the first reason simply because one could easily argue that one has little to no control over oneself (and in extension then - over ones projections) Or that any control you might percieve to have could be just? an illusion as in fact your brain decides before you become consciously aware of that decision, leaving little room for this "super-ego" or the "me" to actually operate. I don't see why ... By: oilygrings. on 01 Apr 11, 22:48:52 I don't see why argument number three, the location of your consciousness, would not be considered scientifically sound. It doesn't assume pre-existing conditions. Unless a better model for deducing the location and nature of your conscious experience of existence crops up, your sense? data is empirically valid. My only comment is. ... By: Roper122. on 09 Mar 11, 11:16:31 My only comment is... the end result? is exactly the same. I agree with everything... but in the end... we're back where we started. DAA-- The fact that ... By: mrbluesky323. on 25 Feb 11, 10:39:15 DAA-- The fact that an argument is "Compelling" to you does not imply that it is true. You phrase the question "is reality real" ---? This is a meaningless question on its face. Reality is defined as real. What you mean to ask is "is reality independent of my consciousness". The 4th argument (the "most compelling") fails if you phrase the question as it should be asked. You could very well say "Isn't it self defeating to use my minds to prove that reality is independent of my mind?" see beyond words... ... By: marshman1405. on 22 Feb 11, 21:37:51 see beyond words...please....try some sort of other way of existing...lalala? For each ... By: HebaruSan. on 27 Jan 11, 23:18:06 For each empirically justified belief B, define B2 as "If reality exists independent of consciousness, then B." Solipsists can freely deny the "then" clauses of the resulting set, and the rest of us can treat the set of B2 statements as Absolute Truth, since they're now stated conditionally. Does this topic require more attention than? that? DAA, this was an ... By: Hardryv. on 15 Jan 11, 01:46:16 DAA, this was an easy +vote due to content, but wouldn't it be simpler to simply acknowledge that both objective and subjective realities are assumed by everyone who accepts them and therein accept that a? god is not disprovable (just how things work) . I too am an atheist in a perspective similar to yours, however I do demand empirical proof of god pre-acceptance because empiricism fosters scientific progress, which appears to yield benefits (regardless of reality). and that has value. great vid James. ... By: sqnyster84. on 15 Jan 11, 00:26:12 great vid James. It's a shame how many atheists are buying into logical positivism? and vulgar empiricism. Keep it up. I just found time ... By: WayOfTheBastard. on 14 Jan 11, 21:59:37 I just found time to watch this today.? But good video James. @Ephemerance [ ... By: Ephemerance. on 08 Jan 11, 05:53:29 @Ephemerance [cont'd] ... appealing to an objective plane of existence beyond our consciousness experiences that indicates whether or not something is an illusion. In contrast, if we say that everything we experience is real, we are saying that nothing is illusion? and everything we consciously experience is objectively real. Much of your video ... By: Ephemerance. on 08 Jan 11, 05:48:49 Much of your video feels like a needlessly wordy beating around the bush to illustrate objectivism versus some form of solipsistic subjective idealism. "Is reality really real?" I like the subject matter you're trying to tackle but it's important to be as concise and clear in your wording as possible (especially when discussing epistemology). Reality is a description of objects which? pertain to that which is real (as opposed to illusions). If we say not everything is real, we are ... [cont'd] "Whether reality ... By: Ephemerance. on 08 Jan 11, 05:41:20 "Whether reality exists in any specific context says nothing about whether [external] reality actually exists." 1:30 "[objectivism is an arbitrary philosophic assumption if only bolstered by empiricism]" 3:15 "limits of consciousness" 5:10 "Synesthesia" 5:50 "consciousness is localized" 6:10 -- I don't agree with this. Perhaps I'm missing something, but nowhere? in your video do I find arguments conclusively for an external objective reality (despite your conclusion). Das,? what exactly ... By: cartbeforehorse. on 02 Jan 11, 18:06:40 Das,? what exactly are you trying to say?: "...serve to make a belief in reality separate from consciousness justified, and render attempts to doubt such a reality unwarranted. But the only way you can accomplish that, is with philosophy". Are you saying that reality didn't exist before people started having philosophical conversations, or just that people didn't believe those realities? The way I look at ... By: Smidge204. on 01 Jan 11, 19:21:25 The way I look at it, empiricism is valid because anything that is said to exists but cannot be demonstrated through physical evidence is indistinguishable from something that does not exist at all - regardless if there is a reality external to my own consciousness or not. My belief? of claims is then based on a mix of evidential support, consistency with past claims/experience, and statistical likelihood. Objectivist Epistemology Posted by: cropperb Video duration: 398 seconds Global video hits: 8598 A short discussion of the epistemic theory of Ayn Rand. Related: ayn, rand, objectivism, education, leonard, peikoff, brandon, cropper, aristotle, read, book, epistemology, philosophy, concept Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: Agreed.? " ... By: ppw00. on 20 Apr 12, 15:24:50 Agreed.? "Meisurement?" Trainwreck.? By: TheFunkyTheist. on 23 Mar 12, 16:51:05 Trainwreck.? This is what is ... By: MagisterPridgen. on 05 Mar 12, 19:29:03 This is what is meant by "axiom". It isn't something you? pull out of your ass or make up and just arbitrarily accept as true, like religious ideas (as an example). There's a world of difference between theology (a non-subject, i.e. devoid of content) and logic or epistemology, which is quite rich in content. This is where? ... By: MagisterPridgen. on 05 Mar 12, 19:26:35 This is where? physical evidence, data, and information comes into play. This is covered by "existence exists." Existence is an abstraction, a concept meaning "that which is" or anything you can detect, identify, or indicate, either with your five sense or sense enhancing instruments such as those used in the sciences. All of these things exist. If you deny existence you pull the rug out from under yourself. Are? you certain? By: MagisterPridgen. on 05 Mar 12, 19:22:39 Are? you certain? First, having a ... By: db11289. on 27 Feb 12, 03:42:38 First, having a baby is a matter of personal choice and one is responsible for their actions. Second, how does it follow that since one does? not sustain oneself through their own efforts initially, they cannot morally keep the fruits of their later efforts once they mature? Oh dear, somebody ... By: SecretTheatre. on 29 Dec 11, 07:53:48 Oh dear, somebody needs? to read Wittgenstein's 'On Certainty' pretty darn quick. Oh dear,? somebody ... By: SecretTheatre. on 29 Dec 11, 07:52:08 Oh dear,? somebody needs to read Wittgenstein's 'On Certainty' pretty darn quick. Oh dear, somebody ... By: SecretTheatre. on 29 Dec 11, 07:51:50 Oh dear, somebody needs to read Wittgenstein's 'On? Certainty' pretty darn quick. Another question: ... By: RonGOdenJr. on 05 Oct 11, 21:44:05 Another question: Since our coming into this world is not a matter of personal choice, how does it rationally follow that anyone be obligated to nurture the helpless baby into adulthood? And upon maturing, how can that life morally stake claim to anything, since he does not owe his initial existence to his own merits and personal? accomplishments, but to the efforts of the generation that preceded him? I know this is an ... By: RonGOdenJr. on 05 Oct 11, 21:26:36 I know this is an old post but I have a question that I'm hoping can be answered: Where does the topic of continuation of the species come into play regarding objectivism? Should the objectivist concern himself with the morality of this issue? If he does, then wouldn't that, by default, clash with his principle? value - the claim that his individual life is the means within itself? The definition? ... By: Kikarok. on 03 Oct 11, 07:23:15 The definition? Cropper gives is implicit in the first definition you give. Cropper's description is what would be necessary for something to be self-evident and require no proof. Then the reverse is ... By: ryan84160. on 31 Jul 11, 09:49:49 Then the reverse is also true. You must accept an axiom as true in? order to prove it to be true. This gets you absolutely fucking no where, you are just arguing in circles. Consciousness is ... By: derfos666. on 27 May 11, 23:17:13 Consciousness is identification needs more explanation: is this the claim that ALL consciousness is identification? If it is, I can deny it without self contradiction by making the claim "not all, but some, consciousness includes identification." Then all I would need to do is give an example of consciousness that doesn't include identification. Candidates could be: religious/spiritual experiences, aesthetic judgments. These are things you can be conscious? of without identifying them as such. How do you think ... By: tautologicalnickname. on 05 Feb 11, 18:19:24 How do you think Rand got to her axioms,? simply the way every other axiom is created: in an arbitrary fashion. Those axioms may appeare "self evident" to you but that's not an argument in favor for their "abstolutivity". Goedel demonstrated that you can't prove an axiom by using its internal formal logic. Hence your axioms are not superior to any other set of ones. I'm sorry but when ... By: tautologicalnickname. on 05 Feb 11, 18:12:38 I'm sorry but when you say that in order to refute an axiom you first have to accept it, are you saying that you accept it because you are using the logic that derives from those axioms in order to refute them? If so then ok the axioms are implicitely true. But I think? there's another way to refute those axioms: simply by arbitrarily chosing axioms that are negative to the first ones. In that way I didn't accept your axioms. I have only read " ... By: GreenFont. on 19 Jan 11, 12:58:53 I have only read "The Virtue of Selfishness" so I am not totally informed on the whole of Objectivism but Rand says? that people should be guided be rationality in order to achieve their values morally, this implies that a person should always take the rational course of action, however paradoxically doesn't this just serve to trap one person within one avenue of action and thus not serving to individually emancipate them from the altruist morality, in short, an implication for free will? I have a few ... By: LithiumLogica. on 27 Dec 10, 22:08:50 I have a few problems with statements you make. An axiom is not "an irrefutable fact". By attempting to refute something as a claim or concept, you do not have to accept it. ax·i·om 1. a self-evident truth that requires no proof. 2.ax·i·om 1. a self-evident truth that requires no proof. 2. a universally accepted principle or rule. 3. Logic, Mathematics .? a proposition that is assumed without proof for the sake of studying the consequences that follow from it. "axioms are not? ... By: SirWinstonChurchill. on 19 Aug 10, 10:35:54 "axioms are not? irrefutable. they are presusppositions." - "Morality" is rooted entirely in a presupposition some higher power defines what is correct for human behavior. Morality and religion belong to the psychology of error. Morality and all of ... By: SirWinstonChurchill. on 19 Aug 10, 10:27:06 Morality and all of those associated ideals are rooted entirely in? the presupposition some higher power defines what is correct for human behavior. Nature is pure war with every man against another. Fear of death is the only way to keep the peace, so man is civilized by the threat of violence against him for transgressions upon his neighbor... Nature does not care. Nature does not need human permission. Nature is the only eternal victor. Nature kills everything. Axioms are HELD as ... By: ephekt420. on 01 Aug 10, 16:33:54 Axioms are HELD as self-evident to the one putting them forth. They are not beyond reproach as pseudo-philosophers like to pretend. If you cannot provide some form of justification for the proclaimed knowledge, then it can safely be regarded as belief. The problem with Rand is that she attempts to create objectivity by fiat and in doing do established? an ideology closer to a cult than open, consistent, approachable philosophy. Nazism and Marxism ... By: ephekt420. on 01 Aug 10, 16:32:06 Nazism and Marxism were revolutionary as well. Being revolutionary doesn't mean they're epistemically valid, coherent or worthy of intellectual respect. There is a reason? no serious professional philosophers take Objectivism seriously. We teach the year ... By: mechnar9. on 27 Jul 10, 11:54:55 We teach the year one undergraduates why existence exists in? logically invalid :) Epistemology: John Locke Posted by: sabbathmaiden Video duration: 625 seconds Global video hits: 640 My lecture over John Locke's epistemology. Related: screencast-o-matic.com Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: JP Moreland : Skepticism and Epistemology 5 of 8 Apologetics Posted by: grandconjunct Video duration: 602 seconds Global video hits: 2785 Christian Philosopher JP Moreland talks about Skepticism and Epistemology I could not find the chart for this epistemology class but i did find a 34 page chart for Morelands Metaphysics class from 1994 in case anyone is interested heres a link to it 64.233.167.104 x Related: apologetics, skepticism, epistemology, philosophy, christianity, moreland, talbot, biola, metaphysics, religion, science, argument, from, reason, mind, victor, reppert, lewis, dangerous, idea, design, dembski, william, craig, aquinas, alvin, plantinga, richard, swinburne, dualism, atheism, agnosticism, hasker, douglas, wilson Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: The "double helix" ... By: cognitivemagic. on 17 Jan 09, 04:08:35 The "double helix" model of DNA was based upon a dream (I forget if it was by Watson or Crick) of intertwining snakes.....definitely an analogy taken from macro-observable objects. In fact, all models of sub-atomic entities, of which we can't directly observe (i.e. Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle), are conceptualized by analogies to things that we can observe (i.e. billiard trajectory-model of atoms).? NO....I wasn't ... By: cognitivemagic. on 01 Jan 09, 19:45:38 NO....I wasn't arguing that "phenomena" are analogical. This is a straw man. I? was arguing that "inductive" reasoning is analogical. Try reading my post before you bother responding. You're only making yourself look stupid here. Science argues that ... By: cognitivemagic. on 01 Jan 09, 19:42:02 Science argues that "past experience" is similar to "future experience".....inductive reasoning, upon which science is based, is entirely analogical reasoning. You're a modern Sophist that hasn't earned any degree in philosophy or science. Plato called people like you "philodoxers": pseudo-intellectual ignoramus' Your post is very inspiring. If the world was populated? entirely by people like you, then perhaps suicide would be a viable option. N: Phenomena aren't ... By: nearenough3. on 31 Dec 08, 17:48:10 N: Phenomena aren't analogies. They are observations. A religious analogy attempts to use a comparison between an undemonstrated phenomenon "God"? and a known thing "creator" or "Father." The items you listed are observable: neutrinos have a mass; gravity exists. The statement " ... By: cognitivemagic. on 30 Dec 08, 06:44:57 The statement "analogies don't prove anything" is false. All claims of natural science based on experience, are founded on analogies...that is to say, phenomena occurring in the "present" are similar, or likened to, phenomena of the "past". But even on a conceptual level, science posits unobservable entities (i.e. quanta, neutrinos, gravitation, space-time, atoms, etc.) that can only be explained, and argued for, in terms of? "analogies" taken from macro observable entities. N: He's just ... By: nearenough3. on 17 Dec 08, 05:31:18 N: He's just drawing analogies with personal things he? knows, trivial things, with theistic claims he wishes to prove correct. Analogies don't prove anything. Another point: the human brain weighs only 1300 grams. The universe weighs too many grams times that to think that the brain can figure it all out, no matter how many synapses are there. Sure, we have limited local knowledge, but the big picture will forever elude us. Just die and try to figure it out later. Ha! The human brain ... By: Lemminkainnen. on 26 Aug 08, 01:23:58 The human brain should not be trusted. It is a marvel of nature, but it is still a flawed cobbled together organ of evolutionary origin. Thus it employs all manner of shortcuts and presupositons about the world? in which it evolved. I was not at this ... By: grandconjunct. on 07 Apr 08, 03:16:34 I was not at this class and I did not see the chart however , I would be willing to bet the chart is older than the section on religion, epistemology and skepticsm in J P Morelands and William Crags book PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS FOR A CHRISTIAN WORLDVIEW (2003) pgs 74-154 deal with skepticism Epistemology and relgion, I found a 34 page outline of Morelands Metaphyscis class from talbot in 1994 just click the link? i just posted in the grey box to the right of this video. Is it possible to ... By: UbiquitousChe. on 07 Apr 08, 01:31:18 Is it possible to get hold of a? shot of that chart? It would be nice to see. If your a brain in ... By: grandconjunct. on 15 Feb 08, 19:07:05 If your a brain in a vat then your words you typed have no correspondence? to anything in a real world, But at least you see that a non designed brain cannot be trusted! you get some big credit for that. JP Moreland did NOT ... By: CAndiron. on 23 Dec 07, 20:54:58 JP Moreland did NOT have coffee for breakfast that morning, because I am a brain in a vat and JP Moreland, youtube, and this key board do not exist! Keanu Reeves and David Hume demonstrated this to me by proving that such a state of affairs is? a logical necessity in this type of universe. The Crow Epistemology Posted by: cropperb Video duration: 360 seconds Global video hits: 1852 The Crow Epistemology is a simple concept that states human minds are finite and can only deal with a certain number of things at a time. How many?... Related: axioms, axiomatic, ayn, rand, objectivism, peikoff, cropper, philosophy, identity, epistemology, crow Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: I've seen crows ... By: Jai666666666. on 04 May 12, 19:33:03 I've seen crows jump in people's faces if they were a menace to me. I raised a baby crow and set it loose..., they love salmon.In fact, they are very intellegent creatures, very suseptable to telepathy. I feed my crows every day, and they certainly give me it back a hundred folds in affection.On the other hand, I have a lot more trouble with humans, I'll pick a cat over any human? for company any day of the week. First, they are much more cleaner, take very little room and are a pleasure to feed. And what about a ... By: Jai666666666. on 04 May 12, 19:27:00 And what about a mind possessed by legions of demonic entities...,? what about an inter dementional being built like a Russian Doll..., what about the mind of a person that has fasted for 40 days and 40 nights..., what about a nind that remembers, say, 20 past life times... A MInd Is A Wonderful Thing To Waste!!! In short, the human ... By: BusinessWithinU. on 12 Jun 11, 15:48:22 In short, the human mind is subjected to? VALUE OVERLOAD... which is called the Crow of Epistemology His head is huge ... By: BunyPunter. on 19 Mar 09, 08:51:55 His head is huge and observaions devine. I'm prelearning about epist-a-me? offagy.Why is pilosophy all about limitting and figuring out a wy to rule.. And guy I got ADHD..I watch 2 tvs at once with an extra one fallout 3 for my 360 while listening to howard stern on my sirius satelite radio...And my laptop going with infor about the game or something else. However when it comes to doing a single task I can get overly caught up.. Such and awkward disorder..And such a stupid subject.roflmfao Don't confuse Crow ... By: tsummerlee. on 12 Jul 08, 01:42:15 Don't confuse Crow Epistemology with memory. CE basicilly asserts, correctly, btw, that the human mind can't read more than four words at a time, or conceptualize more than four numbers at a time. Cropper's Roman Numeral example is a perfect illustration. Which is easier to? grasp: IIIIIIIIII, or 10? That's Crow Epistemology. i call myself the? ... By: n0rthernavenger. on 12 Feb 08, 03:55:34 i call myself the? crow The best speeches ... By: henrihead. on 23 Oct 07, 19:41:21 The best speeches I've given can be summed up as: Tell 'em what you're going to? say. Say it. Then tell 'em what you said. Anything more complicated than that is more than the crowd can absorb. I fault the communist take over of our school system. That is fascinating ... By: cropperb. on 19 Jun 07, 21:13:48 That is fascinating. I read some of the info and results at findarticles[dot]com. Its good to know there is an updated version of the crow? experiment. Brandon, as a grad ... By: PaulMcKeever. on 19 Jun 07, 20:46:12 Brandon, as a grad student in cognitive science ('89-92) I studied "multiple target tracking". I developed an experiment that allowed me to determine? that most subjects could track (in steeply descending order of reliability) 3, 4, or 5 identical moving objects distinguishable from others only by their positions. I'd be happy to show you some of the displays, and to discuss the research, if you're interested. Google: mckeever pylyshyn What the hell is a ... By: mikecarpenter88. on 19 Jun 07, 16:59:44 What the hell is a thickie? If it means stupid, I've? read all of Ayn Rand's fiction and her four main non-fiction books that outline her philosophy. That might? ... By: jiffy2001. on 19 Jun 07, 16:50:35 That might? probably explain why Objectivism isn't for thickies. What about John ... By: mikecarpenter88. on 19 Jun 07, 15:29:37 What about John Galt's speech? It definitely had more than 3-5 points, but it is all in 1? speech. Watch part 3 of the ... By: cropperb. on 19 Jun 07, 15:25:29 Watch part 3 of the German jihaad for a fair run-down of Kant's? main gimmick. Kant was a moron. ... By: cwclemons2007. on 19 Jun 07, 14:47:21 Kant was a moron. That has nothing to do with this video, it just neeed? to be said. Epistemology, I ... By: XOmniverse. on 19 Jun 07, 13:54:11 Epistemology, I think, is probably the least understood but most important part of Objectivism.? Phaedrus Summarizes George Berkeley's Epistemology Posted by: dal6 Video duration: 327 seconds Global video hits: 5037 Phaedrus Summarizes George Berkeley's Epistemology Related: philosophy, george berkeley Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: Religious Faith Morality & Epistemological Absurdities Posted by: Klarkster Video duration: 585 seconds Global video hits: 33794 A little montage of Sam Harris - VS Ramachandran & Richard Dawkins on the perils of the religious dogmatic world-view. Related: atheism, theism, christianity, sam, harris, ramachandran, dawkins, morality, faith, stem, cells, indoctrination, biology, medicine Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: love the? video man By: ttwilkable. on 24 Jan 12, 23:39:27 love the? video man the idea that the ... By: ThinkingInGray. on 16 Jan 12, 01:40:28 the idea that the church? enforced the idea that the 'world is flat' is a fallacy, very few people have ever believed that - it is too easy to disprove due to horizon. A little more of a concern is that you use the word 'obliterate', why is it some hardline anti-church types are so quick to talk about eradicating something? I guess Stalin must be their guide, after all his secular state killed more of its own people than every religious state combined in the last century. @brannen8 This ... By: KnowKnot. on 28 Dec 11, 23:47:33 @brannen8 This country has never supported relativism? In choices of war? Or? pork barrel funding? Or criminal prosecution? Or divorce law? Or...? And it's interesting that "importance" is limited to embryos. Been to a major children's hospital lately? @franciszek8D ... By: KnowKnot. on 28 Dec 11, 23:39:11 @franciszek8D Please.? Your doctrine empowers your intuition (the "spirit"). Your intuition empowers your doctrine (circular?). Both witness to God's enormity, and your inability to understand his "mystery." So his ways AND their results are a mystery. But after that tangle your intuition after a shower is conclusive? Please. @franciszek8D Um... ... By: KnowKnot. on 28 Dec 11, 23:31:34 @franciszek8D Um... yeah. Unless you were born blind. Or with partial brain function. Or with an incompletely formed face (especially if you can't afford the surgery). Or nanocephaly. Or maybe so genetically mangled you died? at birth. brilliant counter ... By: oliverjre. on 25 Dec 11, 15:13:33 brilliant counter argument :s ? MASSIVE PWNAGE by ... By: test123ok. on 18 Nov 11, 03:45:28 MASSIVE PWNAGE by each of these? three scientists. God, shut the fuck ... By: fromstart2finish. on 13 Nov 11, 00:15:15 God, shut the fuck up stupid religious ppl.....? It's not a product ... By: GodTheHypothesis. on 04 Nov 11, 04:47:06 It's not a product of blind chance. There's your mistake. The monkey/typewriter thing was demonstrated (with its solution) in one of dawkins' documentary. Think it was "the blind watchmaker". You should watch that! OR you should react in disgust at reading the word "dawkins" and? crawl away muttering something like "antichrist" ;-) If you want proof ... By: franciszek8D. on 24 Oct 11, 07:42:42 If you want proof of? God's existence look at the mirror! Do you think that such mysterious beings as we are may be the products of the blind chance! Never never never. Human body and psyche is such marvels, such mystery! Without previous design it is impassible unless you believe that monkey pressing typewriter's keys blindly is able to write a scientific book. "spliy brrrain ... By: carlose0318. on 04 Sep 11, 17:21:10 "spliy brrrain patients..." i? love the way ramachandran talks Children, adults ... By: NateKirch. on 31 Jul 11, 19:07:50 Children, adults and elderly have a nervous system. They feel physical and emotional pleasure and pain. They have social relationships, a store of knowledge and memories, desires, fears, regrets, and dreams. They? may have an occupation, hobbies, children of their own. A blasocyst has none of these things. After 6? months of ... By: Jessica1963Forester. on 12 Jul 11, 18:15:17 After 6? months of offering stem cell therapy in combination with the venous angioplasty liberation procedure, patients of CCSVI Clinic have reported excellent health outcomes. Ms. Kasma Gianopoulos of Athens Greece, who was diagnosed with the Relapsing/Remitting form of MS in 1997 called the combination of treatments a "cure". Log on to ccsviclinic. ca for more information. "I feel I am ... By: Jessica1963Forester. on 12 Jul 11, 18:12:54 "I feel I am completely cured" says Ms. Gianopoulos, "my symptoms have disappeared and I have a recovery of many functions, notably my balance and my muscle strength is all coming (back).? Even after six months, I feel like there are good changes happening almost every day. Before, my biggest fear was that the changes wouldn't (hold). I don't even worry about having a relapse anymore". Log on to ccsviclinic. ca for more information. A group of Canadian ... By: Jessica1963Forester. on 12 Jul 11, 18:10:15 A group of Canadian patients just back from Noble have reported similar results. "I can actually see what I thought were long-dead muscles forming in my feet" said Larry Vermeersch of Kenora, Ontario. "My balance is back and I'm walking without a cane. I'm a pretty hard guy to convince, but getting these two procedures together has made me a believer. I'm looking forward to the physio ahead because I can feel everything coming back."? Log on to ccsviclinic. ca for more information. A universal benefit ... By: Jessica1963Forester. on 12 Jul 11, 18:07:50 A universal benefit reported by every patient has been the recovery of? bladder control. Most MS patients have various bladder control symptoms that include urinary urgency, incontinence, nocturia, or urinary hesitancy as a result of the disruption of electrical impulses from the brain to the nerves and muscles that are involved in emptying the bladder (pudenal nerve, urethral sphincter, detrusor muscle). Log on to ccsviclinic. ca for more information. Other recent MS ... By: Jessica1963Forester. on 12 Jul 11, 18:05:14 Other recent MS patients who have had Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT), or stem cell therapy have posted? videos and comments on YouTube v=jFQr2eqm3Cg. Log on to ccsviclinic. ca for more information. Dr.Avneesh Gupte, ... By: Jessica1963Forester. on 12 Jul 11, 18:02:25 Dr.Avneesh Gupte, the Neurosurgeon at Noble Hospital performing the procedure has been encouraged by results in Cerebral Palsy? patients as well. "We are fortunate to be able to offer the treatment because not every hospital is able to perform these types of transplants.You must have the specialized medical equipment and specially trained doctors and nurses". Log on to ccsviclinic.ca for more information. With? regard to MS ... By: Jessica1963Forester. on 12 Jul 11, 17:59:49 With? regard to MS patients, "We are cautious, but nevertheless excited by what patients are telling us. Suffice to say that the few patients who have had the therapy through us are noticing recovery of neuro deficits beyond what the venous angioplasty alone should account for". Log on to ccsviclinic. ca for more information. Dr. Hemangi of ... By: Jessica1963Forester. on 12 Jul 11, 17:57:22 Dr. Hemangi of Noble continues: "These are early days and certainly all evidence that the combination of liberation and stem cell therapies working together at this point is anecdotal. However I am not aware of other medical facilities in the world that offer the synthesis of both to MS patients on an approved basis and it is indeed a rare opportunity? for MS patients to take advantage of a treatment that is quite possibly unique in the world". Log on to ccsviclinic. ca for more information. Autologous stem ... By: Jessica1963Forester. on 12 Jul 11, 17:54:11 Autologous stem cell transplantation is a procedure by which blood-forming stem cells are removed, and later injected back into the patient. All stem cells are taken from the patient themselves and cultured for later injection. In the case of a bone marrow transplant, the HSC are typically removed from the Pelvis through a large needle that can reach? into the bone. Log on to ccsviclinic. ca for more information. The technique is ... By: Jessica1963Forester. on 12 Jul 11, 17:49:57 The technique is referred to as a bone marrow harvest and is performed under a general anesthesia. The incidence of patients experiencing rejection is rare due to the donor and recipient being the same individual. This remains the only approved method of the SCT therapy. Log on to? ccsviclinic. ca for more information. If you're going to ... By: Mattris. on 12 Jun 11, 06:06:27 If you're going to go all the way back to fertilization stage, why not just go back all the way to individual unfertilized eggs. It's not less arbitrary. The egg technically is a potential human even if it's not? fertilized. We'd have to say it's murder every time a woman menstruates. Or how about the sperms? OMG! A man masturbated & killed several trillion possibilities to fertilize an egg! Say it ain't so pop. Say it ain't so. Once you throw out ... By: brannen8. on 03 Jun 11, 16:14:18 Once you throw out the fundamental importance of human life, there is nothing from that logic that restricts you from increasing the window to kill any human beings except for personal preference and opinion. Religion? (Soul) need not even be brought up to refute embryonic stem cell research. "We hold these ... By: brannen8. on 03 Jun 11, 16:13:59 "We hold these Truths? to be self-evident, that *All* Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are *Life*, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness" JP Moreland : Skepticism and Epistemology 6 of 8 Apologetics Posted by: grandconjunct Video duration: 601 seconds Global video hits: 2134 Christian Philosopher JP Moreland talks about skepticism and Epistemology Related: apologetics, skepticism, epistemology, philosophy, christianity, moreland, talbot, biola, metaphysics, religion, science, argument, from, reason, mind, victor, reppert, lewis, dangerous, idea, design, dembski, william, craig, aquinas, alvin, plantinga, richard, swinburne, dualism, atheism, agnosticism, hasker, douglas, wilson Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment Latest comments made on this video: Many thanks....? By: 579steven. on 30 Mar 12, 06:57:06 Many thanks....? Thanks for posting ... By: Ear4Beauty. on 30 Nov 10, 19:19:06 Thanks for posting this series of talks. ? Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40   How to meet women Related Videos How To Meet Women On Facebook - How To Meet Women Online - How To Meet Exotic Foreign Women - How Do Widowers Meet Women - How To Meet Local Single Women - How Do Women Meet Men - How To Meet Women Off Facebook You like it? Share it! Social Bookmarking

How to meet women videos :: Videos are copyright their respective owners :: Feedback powered by: Customer Feedback