 |
The Philosophy and Epistemology of René Descartes
Posted by: wmiller24
Video duration: 1086 seconds
Global video hits: 9387
This is a short video about the philosophy and epistemology of René Descartes, discussing his "method of doubt" and his famous statement "Cogito ergo sum."
Related: rené, descartes, philosophy, epistemology, method, of, doubt, hyperbolic, cogito, ergo, sum, rationalist, rationalism, father, modern, cartesian, coordinates
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
|
|
 |
Introduction: What Epistemology Is
Posted by: CEEChannel
Video duration: 153 seconds
Global video hits: 6763
Dr.Stephen Hicks, Professor of Philosophy at Rockford College and CEE's Executive Director, presents a series of lectures on the philosophy of education. In Part 3, Dr. Hicks gives an overview of epistemology. In this section, he defines epistemology.
Related: dr stephen hicks, rockford college, cee, lecture, course, philosophy, education, epistemology
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
|
|
 |
Atheism, Reality and Epistemology
Posted by: DasAmericanAtheist
Video duration: 515 seconds
Global video hits: 5119
Finally following up this video: www.youtube.com I won't be this long before my next video--promise! Drawing by: www.youtube.com www.aaronphilby.blog spot.com Music by: www.youtube.com
Related: atheism, atheist, theism, theist, christian, christianity, islam, muslim, deist, deism, religion, philosophy, metaphysics, epistemology, solipsism, locke, hume, god, jesus, existence, debate, discussion, dasamericanatheist, yt:stretch=16:9
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
|
|
 |
Objectivist Epistemology
Posted by: cropperb
Video duration: 398 seconds
Global video hits: 8598
A short discussion of the epistemic theory of Ayn Rand.
Related: ayn, rand, objectivism, education, leonard, peikoff, brandon, cropper, aristotle, read, book, epistemology, philosophy, concept
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
|
|
 |
JP Moreland : Skepticism and Epistemology 5 of 8 Apologetics
Posted by: grandconjunct
Video duration: 602 seconds
Global video hits: 2785
Christian Philosopher JP Moreland talks about Skepticism and Epistemology I could not find the chart for this epistemology class but i did find a 34 page chart for Morelands Metaphysics class from 1994 in case anyone is interested heres a link to it 64.233.167.104 x
Related: apologetics, skepticism, epistemology, philosophy, christianity, moreland, talbot, biola, metaphysics, religion, science, argument, from, reason, mind, victor, reppert, lewis, dangerous, idea, design, dembski, william, craig, aquinas, alvin, plantinga, richard, swinburne, dualism, atheism, agnosticism, hasker, douglas, wilson
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
|
|
 |
The Crow Epistemology
Posted by: cropperb
Video duration: 360 seconds
Global video hits: 1852
The Crow Epistemology is a simple concept that states human minds are finite and can only deal with a certain number of things at a time. How many?...
Related: axioms, axiomatic, ayn, rand, objectivism, peikoff, cropper, philosophy, identity, epistemology, crow
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
|
|
 |
Religious Faith Morality & Epistemological Absurdities
Posted by: Klarkster
Video duration: 585 seconds
Global video hits: 33794
A little montage of Sam Harris - VS Ramachandran & Richard Dawkins on the perils of the religious dogmatic world-view.
Related: atheism, theism, christianity, sam, harris, ramachandran, dawkins, morality, faith, stem, cells, indoctrination, biology, medicine
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
|
|
 |
JP Moreland : Skepticism and Epistemology 6 of 8 Apologetics
Posted by: grandconjunct
Video duration: 601 seconds
Global video hits: 2134
Christian Philosopher JP Moreland talks about skepticism and Epistemology
Related: apologetics, skepticism, epistemology, philosophy, christianity, moreland, talbot, biola, metaphysics, religion, science, argument, from, reason, mind, victor, reppert, lewis, dangerous, idea, design, dembski, william, craig, aquinas, alvin, plantinga, richard, swinburne, dualism, atheism, agnosticism, hasker, douglas, wilson
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
|
|
|
|
How to meet women Related VideosYou like it? Share it!
Social Bookmarking 
|
Latest comments made on this video:
By: im10pplok. on 04 Mar 12, 17:20:29
WOW!!!just..WOW!!subbed:)?
By: dotspace77. on 24 Dec 11, 16:34:23
Very interesting? and clear, thanks.
By: rydhwan. on 20 Dec 11, 20:53:39
cool hwip?
By: MrKingatheist. on 25 Jul 11, 21:33:03
I am confused. Im into ethics, in philosophy. Where does Epistemology fit into ethics. Also where does metaphysics fit into ethics? whats the difference between Epistemology and metaphysics? how do they effect moral theorys in philosophy? ?
By: TheSteinmetzen. on 13 Jun 11, 07:19:23
This is so insightful.? Thanks!
By: ScalerWave. on 12 May 11, 21:23:30
"I am the wisest man alive, for I know one thing, and that? is that I know nothing." Socrates
By: FantasticBabblings. on 09 Jan 11, 21:35:37
@0zyzzyz0 Thanks for your comment. The problem with getting into the academic thinking on the? subject is that it easily becomes a quagmire as you so rightly said. That type of exegesis is best written so the reader can go back and re-read and jump back and forth. Not really suited to a video. The favorite button is now under the "Add to" button. Thanks again.
By: The1066Al. on 30 Nov 10, 22:57:05
The philosophy of materialism ultimately relies for its? validity on strong empiricism: "all knowledge derives from sense perception". Trouble is that that idea does not itself derive from sense perception. Hence the epistemology on which materialism (and therefore atheism) depends is self-refuting. If there is any philosophy which is irrational it is materialism, since matter cannot account for the objective validity of reason, in other words, for 'mind'.
By: tiediegoddess. on 13 Jul 10, 15:29:54
thank you. ?
By: oiuoiu988. on 01 May 10, 21:15:44
about the last line in your video, positivism has been used chiefly as a justification for imposing the will? of the people in power onto the masses, dont pretend it somehow helps individual freedom.
By: oiuoiu988. on 01 May 10, 21:12:52
and let me just add that your main problem is that youre trying to apply the epistemological underpinnings of PHYSICAL science to social science where it has absolutely no place because it(knowledge of social science) cannot? be falsified.
By: oiuoiu988. on 01 May 10, 21:09:10
logical positivism is in direct conflict with logic & reason, it has become a religion unto itself... putting verifiability ahead of logic, reason and philosophical investigation is the calling card of the 20th century religious positivist psuedo-intellectual. you seem to be trapped in about 1987 or so... is it fair to APPLY ANYTHING TO EVERYONE? how does this application take place? the need to apply something to everyone is just vile statist rhetoric and you seem to be a complete dupe.?
By: moyga. on 20 Apr 10, 12:01:33
Thanks for this, I am studying Epistemology at the? moment and I really liked that little diagram you made, I'd never seen JTB as K expressed visually like that.
By: Triumph919. on 14 Apr 10, 21:33:59
you are? narrow minded.. i dont like you...
By: 1SikBR. on 28 Feb 10, 15:38:42
Thanks for the effort, and while I agree with most? of what you said, the background music is too distracting.
By: billhuston. on 01 Jan 10, 03:33:49
What do you mean by "fantasy"? You claim no bias, yet it is there. The courts should stick to what is true, right? People have been imprisoned for? being delusional. Isn't that just name-calling and judgement? I say your claim that "evidentiary knowledge" exists is a fantasy! Please show me some. If you look deeply here, you will find an unsolvable paradox. I prefer RAW's term, "reality tunnel". Everyone has their own. This term avoids the possible pejorative :)
By: FantasticBabblings. on 01 Jan 10, 02:53:02
I also stated that I have my own imaginative (fantasy) world, so if I am being pejorative (not perjorative) I am also disparaging myself. This video expresses no judgment of fantasies, just an effort to separate them from evidentiary knowledge. The diagram is merely an exemplar, not an effort? to show the actual proportions of truth and falsity. I'm sure all views are true... in someone's fantasy world.
By: billhuston. on 01 Jan 10, 00:19:47
A lot of good stuff here. Thanks for sharing. In the last statement, "Everyone should be free to believe their own fantasy world", isn't that a judgment, perjorative? By "fantasy world" do you mean "false view?" Why not? just say, "everyone should be free"? How would you (or anyone) know, a priori, that a particular view was a fantasy or not? There is another area of possibility which your Venn diagram did not cover. And that is the possibility that all views are true.
By: chucie5. on 04 Nov 09, 08:49:58
very good video? phil ...deep
By: olstrawberries. on 13 Oct 09, 08:24:18
Yeah, I hear all that, but sometimes and I do mean only sometimes, in order to fully experience the strangeness and and intensity of art or? fantasy or the subconscious, we have to let go completely from this 'skill' you mentioned of separating that which is speculative and that which has been scientifically integrated. We must not let reason abdicate the throne of intuition but maybe they could sit together a while and avoid the pitfalls of extreme ignorance. Science is magic, magic is science.
By: ogirv101. on 06 Oct 09, 10:56:44
"A weak atheist says there is no evidence to suggest any gods exist and on those grounds I don't believe any do." Is that not a negative proof fallacy,? just awnser, that's what it sounds like to me. Also Agnosticism and ATheism are not mutually exclusive, but Theism isn't either.
By: ogirv101. on 05 Oct 09, 18:44:17
All the names you've mentioned do suggest strong atheistic characteristics, for example Dawkins says he's near sure that God doesn't exist and knows for sure religion is wrong (and he makes a strawman argument about the way all religions work and believe.) Dawkins claims that all? religions rely on blind faith, that's a strawman argument, and focuses on literal interpretations of scripture to make his arguments, this is absurd and a strawman argument.
By: ogirv101. on 02 Oct 09, 22:22:49
Oh your brand of Atheism is alot different than what most of the younger Atheists are. I'm surprised to find an ATheist liek you, and no matter how much it hurts me, your belief system is respectable. Furthermore, I probably didn't listen, I just feel like arguing with? someone right now, I'm a very contentious person and simple conversations seem banal to me.
By: FantasticBabblings. on 02 Oct 09, 22:05:39
It depends on your definition of atheism. For me, it means I have no gods; it does not mean I insist that no god exists. Atheists themselves argue and split hairs over the meaning and I have no interest in pursuing that? argument. I did NOT say knowledge is justification. I said it is the result of justification of that which is true and believed. You either didn't listen or aren't very bright.
By: ogirv101. on 02 Oct 09, 19:39:34
Atheism is seen as illogical in epistemologial terms. Skepticism is alright and is needed,? but extreme recalcitrance passed as skepticism is a threat to Science. Furthermore you started off with knowledge being justification. No, justification isn't knowledge.